20070044403 | Floor coverings with wooden floors on a substrate, method for the covering of a substrate and use of studded plates | March, 2007 | Julton |
20070204522 | Gutter clip and method for manufacture thereof | September, 2007 | Tredennick |
20030029099 | Telescopic type store | February, 2003 | Torata |
20080178555 | TAPERED TRUSS | July, 2008 | Green et al. |
20100000165 | SOLAR ROOF | January, 2010 | Koller |
20090126285 | Facility Module for Production and Storage of Cell Therapy Product | May, 2009 | Suh et al. |
20030177712 | Flashing system | September, 2003 | Gatherum |
20090282749 | RE-CONFIGURABLE ARMORED TACTICAL PERSONNEL AND COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY | November, 2009 | Warminsky |
20090301023 | Process for the Production of Reinforced and Cast, Cellular or Foamed Concrete Bodies and Reinforcement Support Frame for the Use in Such a Process | December, 2009 | Heerens et al. |
20030126805 | Tornado or hurricane shelter | July, 2003 | Roberts |
20080110111 | Prefabricated structural element for buildings | May, 2008 | Bleibler |
[0001] This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/267,985, filed Oct. 8, 2002, incorporated by reference herein.
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates generally to exterior wall systems for commercial and residential structures. In another aspect, the invention concerns lightweight prefabricated wall panels. In a further aspect, the invention relates to precast concrete wall panels.
[0004] 2. Description of the Prior Art
[0005] Precast concrete wall panels have been used for years to provide durable and aesthetically pleasing exterior walls. One disadvantage of traditional precast concrete wall panels is the weight of the panels. The high weight of conventional precast wall panels can make them expensive to ship and erect. Further, because heavy wall panels cause deflection of structural steel wall members supporting the panels, the strength of the steel frame of a building may need to be increased in order to adequately support concrete wall panels without excessive deflection. Such a need to increase the strength of the structural steel members of a building can add significantly to the overall cost of the building.
[0006] In recent years, several lightweight alternatives to traditional precast concrete wall panels have been used. One such system is commonly known as EIFS (Exterior Insulation and Finish System). EIFS is a multi-layered exterior wall system that typically consists of a lightweight pliable insulation board covered with a fiberglass reinforced base coat that is coated with a colored acrylic finish coat. Although EIFS is lightweight and provides thermal insulation, a number of drawbacks are associated with EIFS. For example, EIFS walls have a tendency to crack and allow moisture to seep between the EIFS layers or between the innermost EIFS layer and the interior wall. In either case, such leakage can cause water damage and/or damage due to mold or mildew. In fact, the tendency of EIFS wall systems to leak has caused many insurance companies to stop writing policies covering EIFS structures. A further disadvantage of EIFS is its lack of durability. For example, simply bumping an EIFS wall with a lawn mower or other equipment during routine lawn maintenance can physically and visibly damage the EIFS wall, thereby necessitating expensive repair. Another problem with EIFS is the inability to form a true caulk joint at the edge of the wall. This inability to form a true caulk joint is caused by the fact that EIFS walls lack a sufficiently thick rigid edge. A proper caulk joint typically requires at least one inch of rigid edge so that a backer-rod can be inserted into a joint and a bead of caulk can fill the joint and seal against at least one half inch of the rigid edge. This allows the seal to maintain integrity during normal shifting and expansion/contraction of the structure. Thus, the lack of a true caulk joint in EIFS walls can contribute to moisture leakage.
[0007] Another lightweight wall system that has been introduced in recent years employs precast GFRC (Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete) wall panels. GFRC wall panels are relatively strong compared to EIFS, but have a number of drawbacks. The main drawback of GFRC wall panels is expense. The making of GFRC wall panels is a labor intensive process wherein concrete and glass fibers are sprayed in a form. In addition to high labor costs associated with GFRC fabrication, the material cost of the glass fibers adds significantly to the overall cost of a GFRC wall panel.
[0008] Another relatively lightweight wall panel system that is being used today is commonly known as “slender wall.” Slender wall prefabricated wall panels typically include a relatively thin steel-reinforced concrete slab with structural steel framing rigidly attached to one side of the slab. A disadvantage of the slender wall system is that it requires the concrete supplier to fabricate the metal frame backup system, which requires a significant amount of design and fabrication time. Another disadvantage is that the inside face of the metal frame must be in near perfect alignment for proper drywall attachment.
[0009] Responsive to these and other problems, it is an object of the present invention to provide a lightweight, durable, and inexpensive prefabricated wall panel system.
[0010] A further object of the invention is to provide a lightweight prefabricated wall panel of sufficient rigidity and thickness so that a proper caulk joint can be formed around the edge of the panel.
[0011] Another object of the invention is to provide a prefabricated wall panel system that can easily be attached to a thin metal framing member (e.g., a metal stud or C/Z purlin) of a support wall system.
[0012] Still another object of the invention is to provide an improved method of constructing a wall using lightweight precast wall panels.
[0013] Yet another object of the invention is to provide an improved method of making a lightweight prefabricated wall panel.
[0014] It should be understood that not all of the above-listed objects need be accomplished by the present invention, and further objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, the drawings, and the claims.
[0015] Accordingly, in one embodiment of the present invention there is provided a lightweight precast wall panel comprising a concrete slab and a plurality of elongated spaced-apart channels coupled to the slab. Each of the channels includes a substantially flat cross member and a pair of spaced-apart side members extending from the cross member. The side members are partially embedded in the slab and the cross member is spaced from the slab.
[0016] In another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of constructing a wall comprising the steps of: (a) erecting a support wall having a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic outer wall framing members; (b) positioning a precast concrete wall panel adjacent the support wall, with the wall panel including a concrete slab and a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic channels that are partially embedded in the slab; and (c) coupling the wall panel to the support wall by extending self-tapping screws through the channels and the wall framing members at attachment locations where the channels and the framing members cross.
[0017] In still another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a precast concrete wall system comprising a support wall, a precast wall panel, and a plurality of fasteners. The support wall includes a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic framing members. The wall panel includes a concrete slab and a plurality of generally parallel spaced-apart elongated metallic channels. The channels are partially embedded in the slab and are elongated in a direction that is substantially perpendicular to the direction of elongation of the framing members. The fasteners extend through the framing members and the channels at attachment locations where the framing members and channels cross.
[0018] In yet another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of making a precast wall panel comprising the steps of: (a) stamping a first series of openings in a substantially flat piece of sheet metal; (b) stamping a second series of openings in the sheet metal; (c) cutting the sheet metal along the first and second series of openings to form an elongated sheet metal section having opposite first and second edges at least partly defined by the first and second series of openings, respectively; and (d) bending the elongated sheet metal section along two substantially parallel bend lines, thereby forming a channel member having a generally flat cross member defined between the two bend lines, a first side member extending from the cross member at one of the bend lines, and a second side member extending from the cross member at the other bend line.
[0019] A preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031] Referring initially to
[0032] Referring to
[0033] The shape, size, and weight of wall panel
[0034] Referring to
[0035] The use of self-tapping screws
[0036] Because self-tapping screw
[0037] Referring now to
[0038] Referring again to
[0039] Referring to
[0040] Referring to
[0041] The configuration of each channel
[0042] Referring to
[0043] Referring to
[0044] The preferred forms of the invention described above are to be used as illustration only, and should not be used in a limiting sense to interpret the scope of the present invention. Obvious modifications to the exemplary embodiments, set forth above, could be readily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
[0045] The inventors hereby state their intent to rely on the Doctrine of Equivalents to determine and assess the reasonably fair scope of the present invention as pertains to any apparatus not materially departing from but outside the literal scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.