20040011236 | Penetrator arrow projectile | January, 2004 | Fossumstuen et al. |
20050098055 | Irritation bodies | May, 2005 | Grosch |
20070131129 | SELF-SUPPORTING AIR TUBE FOR BLASTING AND METHOD OF BLASTING ROCK USING THE SAME | June, 2007 | Kang |
20060027128 | Firearms projectile having jacket runner | February, 2006 | Hober |
20050016407 | Installation for programmable pyrotechnic shot firing | January, 2005 | Bernard |
20080098921 | BLASTING SYSTEM AND METHOD | May, 2008 | Labuschagne et al. |
20060027131 | Ammunition | February, 2006 | Byer |
20060096488 | Target practice ammunition | May, 2006 | Cognet et al. |
20030136291 | Standoff or proximity optronic fuse | July, 2003 | Ganghofer |
20090308274 | Integrated Pusher Plate for a Canister- or Gun-Launched Projectile and System Incorporating Same | December, 2009 | Schroeder et al. |
20070131131 | Upset jacketed bullets | June, 2007 | Stock Jr. et al. |
[0001] This application claims priority from International Application No. PCT/US00/19031, filed Jul. 12, 2000 and from U.S. Ser. No. 60/143,827, filed Jul. 13, 1999, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference.
[0002] There may be environmental and occupational hazards associated with the manufacture, deployment and use of depleted uranium (DU) as a ballistic penetrator. It would be desirable to have an alternative, benign material having penetration characteristics at least about equal to DU.
[0003] When a penetrator interacts with armor, it generates an aerosol and particles which are respirable and which may reach the gas exchange region of the human lung. In addition, penetrator impact fragments are deposited into the soil and can eventually find their way into the human food chain. DU is known to be toxic to the kidney, and it is also theoretically carcinogenic because of its residual radioactivity. Known tungsten heavy alloys, besides being inferior in penetration performance versus DU, contain nickel and cobalt alloying constituents that are also known to be toxic.
[0004] As a result of the foregoing, the testing of munitions with DU penetrators is limited to a few testing ranges within the U.S., and essentially, warfighters cannot train with the actual ammunition they will use in wartime because of the severe restrictions placed on training exercises at even these limited testing ranges in the U.S. After DU munitions are used in war (e.g. Desert Storm), a subsequent cleanup effort should be conducted to recover DU from the soil and prevent it from entering a food chain. Stored DU ammunition must be continuously inspected and accounted for during peacetime, introducing a non-productive accountancy requirement to the U.S. logistics chain.
[0005] Attempts have heretofore been made to develop polycrystalline tungsten-based composites and tungsten heavy alloys as replacements for DU. Despite developments that led to some increases in strength and toughness, the basic penetration performance of these materials did not significantly improve and did not approach that of DU. These studies demonstrated that penetration performance is not solely a function of strength or ductility.
[0006] After much research, it is now believed that material flow and failure mechanisms, not strength and ductility, are key properties in determining penetration performance. As a penetrator strikes armor, a high deformation rate in the penetrator causes heat to be generated. Because there is not enough time to conduct/diffuse this heat away from the deformation area, thermal softening occurs which overcomes the effect of previous hardening mechanisms, such as strain hardening. As a result, gross penetrator deformation occurs in locally softer material, along adiabatic shear bands, and the rapid failure along these adiabatic shear bands allows the penetrator to rapidly shed excess material. This rapid, localized deformation allows material to slough off and thus maintains a small diameter at the penetrator/armor interface. Without such localized shearing, the penetrator would form a large-diameter, blunt-nosed head that is much less effective. For a given value of kinetic energy, the small diameter penetrator will need to move less armor material, and will penetrate farther, than a larger, blunt-nosed penetrator.
[0007] The deformation behavior of DU follows the adiabatic shear band phenomenon described above, and the self-sharpening DU penetrator produces a small diameter hole in the armor. Single crystal unalloyed tungsten is also found to exhibit local deformation behavior, along crystalline planes, similar to that of DU. Single crystal unalloyed tungsten, when its [100] axis is parallel to the direction of travel, exhibits penetration capabilities equal to that of DU. Performance in other crystalline orientations, such as [111] or [110], is inferior to the [100] orientation. However, single crystal unalloyed tungsten has a high muzzle-launch failure rate; it appears to lack sufficient strength and ductility to reliably remain intact after launching.
[0008] The following criteria have now been developed by U.S. Army TACOM-ARDEC for screening candidate penetrator materials. If a candidate material meets and/or exceeds these screening criteria, it is felt that there is a high assurance that the material will survive muzzle launch. These screening criteria are:
[0009] Ultimate Tensile Strength≧180 ksi;
[0010] Tensile Yield Strength≧100 ksi; and
[0011] Elongation≧12%.
[0012] It is an object of the present invention to provide high density penetrators that will meet the foregoing criteria and to provide methods for efficiently and economically fabricating such Penetrator.
[0013] Certain high creep strength, single crystal tungsten alloys have now been developed which have increased strength and ductility compared to that of unalloyed single crystal tungsten. Tensile tests of one such single crystal tungsten alloy produced the following results:
[0014] Ultimate Tensile Strength≧200 ksi;
[0015] Tensile Yield Strength≧100 ksi; and
[0016] Elongation≧20%.
[0017] Such single crystal tungsten alloys are considered to have sufficient strength and ductility to survive muzzle launch. These high tungsten alloys contain at least about 90% tungsten, generally between about 90% and about 97%. Alloyed with the tungsten is tantalum, rhenium, niobium, molybdenum or a mixture of two or more of these metals.
[0018] Also provided are methods for economically and efficiently producing such high density penetrators using CVD. By using an appropriate single crystal substrate and CVD, it has been found that a single crystal body suitable for use as a high density penetrator can be fabricated from such an alloy of choice. In addition, a generally closed CVD system is also provided which makes very efficient use of raw materials and minimizes the creation of reaction by-products that would otherwise require processing and/or other clean-up treatment prior to being discarded.
[0019] In one particular aspect, the invention provides a high density penetrator designed to be propelled from the muzzle of a weapon, which penetrator comprises a shaped single crystal alloy body consisting essentially of at least 90% tungsten with the remainder being essentially tantalum, rhenium, niobium, molybdenum or a mixture thereof.
[0020] In another particular aspect, the invention provides a method for making a single crystal, high density alloy body containing a major amount of tungsten and a minor amount of tantalum, rhenium, niobium and/or molybdenum as an alloying metal, which body is suitable for use as a high density penetrator, said method comprising providing a chamber suitable for carrying out chemical vapor deposition (CVD), locating a single crystal substrate which is stable at a temperature of at least about 800° C. within said chamber, introducing (a) tungsten chloride or fluoride vapor or (b) a vapor mixture of chlorides or fluorides of tungsten and said alloying metal into said CVD chamber, with the optional inclusion of H
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024] As indicated above, it has been found that bodies of single crystal material can be formed of tungsten alloys which will have characteristics which meet the desired criteria set down by the United States Army for high density penetrators that will survive muzzle launch from a weapon. These single crystal materials should contain at least about 90% tungsten, e.g. about 90 to about 97%, preferably contain between about 91% and about 95% tungsten and more preferably contain between about 92% and about 94% tungsten, with one preferred alloy containing about 93% tungsten. Tungsten has a body-centered cubic crystalline structure, and the alloying elements should either have a body-centered cubic crystal structure or a hexagonal close packed crystal structure. The remainder of the alloy preferably contains tantalum, rhenium, niobium, molybdenum or a mixture of two or more of such metals. Although minor amounts of other elements having such a crystal structure can be tolerated, such presence should be minimized so as not to detract from the desired high density of the body. Of the candidates for alloying elements, rhenium has a particularly high density, and tantalum alloys exhibit particularly high strength. Accordingly, tantalum and rhenium are considered to be preferred. The single crystal body should have a density of at least about 98% of maximum theoretical density of the alloy. As an example, one preferred alloy contains about 93% tungsten and about 7% tantalum.
[0025] The penetrators may have various shapes so long as they are suitable for being propelled from the muzzle of a weapon, e.g. canons, machine guns and the like. They will normally have a fairly high length to diameter ratio, and they will usually have either an aerodynamically-shaped head or be embodied within a mass that has such a aerodynamically-shaped head as described hereinafter.
[0026]
[0027] It has been found that, in some instances, it may be desirable (see
[0028] A further alternative example of a penetrator
[0029] The single crystal body can be formed using a zone-refining process, as known in this art, in which an electron beam filament carefully locally heats a rod to cause localized melting and then recrystallization. A single crystal seed is located at the bottom of a polycrystalline rod of the desired alloy composition. The electron beam filament initially heats and melts the bottom of the polycrystalline rod where there is contact with the single crystal seed which is oriented with its [100] axis aligned with the long axis of the rod that will constitute the penetrator. The single crystal structure of the seed and its orientation spreads into the molten zone, transforming that portion of the now melted polycrystalline rod into conforming single crystal material. The filament slowly travels up the length of the rod, producing a local molten zone as it travels. This enables the single crystal structure to spread upward, the molten zone transforming the former polycrystalline crystallography into a single crystal having the desired axial orientation. The resultant single crystal material can then be shaped by grinding or other machining operations so as to have the desired penetrator shape, e.g. a solid cylinder having an external head end taper as shown in
[0030] It has been found that high density single crystal material having a desired crystalline axial orientation can also be formed using conventional chemical vapor deposition(CVD) methods. As depicted schematically in
[0031] Using a standard quartz chamber or enclosure
[0032] If instead a mixture of tungsten and tantalum chlorides is used together with a higher temperature of about 1200 to about 1300° C. and otherwise standard CVD conditions, the desired alloy will be readily deposited without the inclusion of hydrogen. Thus, the inclusion of hydrogen in the gaseous mixture is considered to be optional, and therefore only a minor amount or no hydrogen may be included. The unreacted chlorides and/or fluorides along with the HF or C
[0033] Both of the foregoing methods are fairly expensive to operate, and it has now been found that a single crystal tungsten alloy material can also be produced using what is being termed a static CVD system and is schematically shown in the accompanying
[0034] As seen in
[0035] A side entrance
[0036] As an example of operation, the single crystal substrate
[0037] The operation is allowed to simply continue until the desired diameter single crystal alloy body has been produced. However, to avoid the potential build-up of contamination within the chamber
[0038] It has been found that, as the diameter of the resultant body being caused to radially grow through CVD substantially exceeds the diameter of the original single crystal wire or rod that serves as the substrate, there is a tendency for the axial orientation of the newly deposited crystalline material to vary. Generally, this is not a problem until the ratio of the diameter of the single crystal body to the diameter of the original substrate exceeds about 3 or 4 to 1. Because this may oftentimes be the situation, attention has been given to it, and it has been found that carrying out the CVD at a higher temperature, for example about 1600 to about 2200° C., has the effect of annealing out strains that may be induced by such alternative crystalline orientation and assures the growth of the single crystal body having the desired orientation. Accordingly, it may be desirable to employ temperatures in the higher portion of the range of about 800° C. to about 2200° C. whenever the diameter of the desired resultant product will be more than about five times that of the substrate, in order to assure a uniform resultant product. Even when such higher substrate temperatures are employed, the feedstock temperature is preferably in the range of about 700° to about 900° C.
[0039] Once a single crystal body of the desired diameter has been achieved, the equipment is shut down and allowed to slowly cool to ambient temperature. Removal of the body from the chamber
[0040] Using this static CVD method, the cost to produce such bodies of high density, single-crystal, tungsten alloys particularly suited for use as high-density penetrators is reduced significantly over either the traditional zone-refining method or the standard CVD method. When employing the standard CVD process, for example, a certain proportion of the metal chlorides or metal fluorides will not react and will be carried out of the reactor as a part of the exhaust system, which then must either be treated to reclaim these reactants or appropriately disposed of. Likewise, there are essentially toxic HF, HCl and/or Cl
[0041] In certain instances, it may be desirable to have the penetrator include some pyrophoric material, i.e. a pyrophor, which will oxidize and create smoke or fumes that will be indicative that a particular target has indeed been penetrated by breaching its armor, thereby allowing focus to be shifted to another potential target. Suitable pyrophoric materials for this purpose include hafnium, titanium and zirconium. In the case of an otherwise homogenous penetrator, it might be suitable to simply drill out the original molybdenum core and then fill this core with a suitable pyrophor, e.g. hafnium. On the other hand, if a multiple rod penetrator, such as that depicted in
[0042] Although the invention has been described with regard to certain preferred embodiments which constitute the best mode presently known to the inventor, it should be understood that various changes and modifications as would be obvious to one having the ordinary skill in this art, may be made without departing from the invention which is defined by the claims appended hereto. For example, although the discussion of the fabrication processes mention using a feedstock of 93% tungsten and 7% tantalum, all or a part of the tantalum might be substituted by rhenium, and rhenium chloride (ReCl
[0043] Particular features of the invention are emphasized in the claims which follow.