The incidence of pollinosis (hay fever), ie the allergic reaction of the mucous membranes of the eye and of the upper and lower respiratory tracts with flower pollen and other airborne allergens, in the population has been monitored in Germany for a number of years. It was found for the last few years that about 11-15% of the population is affected. The allergic reaction of a pollen allergy usually manifests itself in reddening and lacrimation of the eyes (conjunctivitis), sneezing episodes (rhinitis) and a dry cough (bronchial asthma) as early reactions. Known late reactions to pollen allergy include for example neurodermatitis or eczema. As well as the personal symptoms of sufferers, there are more far-reaching consequences such as loss of earnings or work incapacity during the pollen season or increased medical treatment costs, so that there is an immense need for a gridlike pollen guard within the meaning of the invention for attachment in front of the windows and doors of living and working areas. Further information about pollinosis is available in Ratgeber Pollenallergie, Ute Kücnkele, Munich 1992.
 Pollen allergies are triggered by the genes of wind-pollinated plants which, unlike insect-pollinated plants, utilize air movement to transfer their male genes. Pollens of wind-pollinated plants are for this reason generally smaller than those of insect-pollinated plants. Frequently occurring sizes are in the range from 15 to 50 μm. Familiar examples of wind-pollinated plants which trigger pollen-allergic reactions are birch, hazel, ragweed and a number of grass species.
 Pollen guard systems for different applications are known. Filtration means whereby air is freed of pollen, germs and spores find use for example in airconditioning and automobiles. The filtering effect is achieved in DE 39 04 623 A1 for example through the use of multi-ply filter mats formed from fleeces. To intensify the contact of the particle-laden air with the filter, the laminate of filter mats is additionally folded in a zigzag shape. The filtering effect against pollen is achieved by the fibrousness of the fleeces, since the interstices between the fibers are smaller than the pollen to be filtered.
 A window guard against pollen, germs and spores is disclosed for example in DE 197 22 326 A1. A fleece is attached as a guard in front of the windowpane, not over the whole area thereof, but in the two wedgelike interstices and also the rectangular opening at the upper side of a window in tilt position.
 A further way to filter pollen etc is proposed in DE 297 01 218 U. The filter is devised as a system to be attached in front of the window over the whole area thereof. The arrangement consists of a shrink film which is to be applied in front of the window and which in one area has a cutout into which a filter fleece is adhered by means of a doublesided adhesive tape.
 A more developed form of a pollen filter is described in DE 198 56 490 A1. In this case, the filter consists of a fleece formed of polymeric fibers having an electrostatic activity and very fine pores to collect dust particles below 1 μm in size. The fleece in this example is additionally reinforced by a nonwoven scrim.
 An example of the filtering of pollen and dust particles by wovens is illustrated in WO 94/09884 A1. The filtering effect in this case is achieved by a woven microfilament fabric where the filaments are spaced apart on the order of 30 μm.
 Textile fabrics such as wovens, formed-loop knits and drawn-loop knits frequently offer advantages in mechanical stability over fleeces. Fleeces must for this reason be separately consolidated in the manufacturing operation. Another disadvantage with the use of fleeces is the less favorable air permeability and visual transparency for the same basis weight, for example on the order from 50 to 100 g/m
 The approach of using textured yarn material in textile fabrics to achieve a filtering effect against pollen is novel and to be protected.
 Textile fabric refers to the totality of ways of producing textiles from yarn material by conventional fabric-forming operations such as drawn-loop knitting, formed-loop knitting or weaving without wishing to be bound by any one technique. The fundamentals of textile fabric-forming operations can be researched in Alfons Hofer: “Stoffe 2”, 1983, Deutsch Fachbuchverlag or “Kettwirkpraxis”, No. 4, 1970, pages 19 to 20, Technologien der Kettwirkerei.
 The texturing of yarn material is primarily used for textile fabrics formed from manufactured fibers such as polyester or polyamide in order that a character akin to a natural fiber may be conferred on the artificial fibers. Manufactured fibers differ from natural fibers, with regard to the spinning into yarns, in the length of the filaments to be spun into yarns. The filament length of natural fibers is substantially shorter than that of manufactured fibers and only amounts to a few centimeters. When short filament lengths are spun into yarns and threads, as is the case with cotton for example, it acquires bulk and hence a pleasant feel by virtue of the protruding filament ends. In contrast, manufactured fibers are used in the form of the continuous filaments which, after spinning into yarn, have a parallel position relative to each other and confer a smooth, unnatural feel on the yarn.
 The texturing of yarn material composed of artificial continuous filaments can be effected for example by deforming the filaments from their parallel position by torsion or bending with subsequent heatsetting. An example is the so-called false twisting process [Grundlagen der Textilveredelung, 13th revised edition, Deutsch Fachbuchverlag 1989].
 Textile fabrics in manufactured fibers such as polyester with textured yarn material are frequently used, on account of their pleasant sensory properties, for apparel purposes for example as front appliqué in the high-ticket outerwear sector. The use as a pollen guard in front of window areas and door openings and also for other air inlets is a new field of application and is to be protected.
 The use of a textile fabric having textured threads has the advantage over the cited approach of achieving a filtration of pollen through the small distance between warp and fill threads in the case of woven fabrics that the filaments of the textured thread narrow the actual space between the threads and thereby create spacings between the filaments of two adjacent threads and/or the filaments of the textured thread that are impassable for pollen. In addition, the bulking of the threads results in the two-dimensional fabric being extended into the third dimension. The textured threads thus on the one hand, through a longer flow path, extend the contact time of the air with the filter material and on the other enlarge the filter surface area, which leads to improved filter properties.
 This permits for example a higher air permeability which enables improved airing of the amenities, since the spacings of warp and fill threads do not have to be reduced to the diameter of the pollen to be filtered to achieve filtering.
 As already mentioned in DE 29 05 423 A1, textured threads find use in wovens for the microfiltration of liquid and gaseous media. What is not mentioned, however, is the use of a textile fabric, especially of a formed-loop knit, as a guard means to be applied in front of an airing means such as for example a window over the whole area thereof to prevent pollen entering an amenity.
 Nor in particular is there any mention in DE 29 05 324 A1 of a formed-loop knit into which the textured fill threads are inlaid.
 It is an object of the proposed invention to indicate a textile fabric such as a woven or loop-formingly knitted fabric that can be used as a pollen guard in front of windows or doors over the whole area thereof.
 This object is achieved as set forth in the main claim. The subclaims relate to advantageous refinements of the inventive concept.
 The invention accordingly provides a textile fabric, preferably a woven or loop-formingly knitted fabric, in which at least one textured fill thread is inlaid.
 A particularly preferred embodiment of the invention to be protected is a loop-formingly knitted fabric in which at least one textured fill thread is inlaid.
 As a matter of definition, there are significant differences between wovens and formed-loop knits (cf. DIN 62050-1 and 2, June and April 1990 respectively, “Gewirke und Gestricke” and DIN 61100, October 1964, “Gewebe”). Formed-loop knits are accordingly textile fabrics which are formed from one or more threads or from one or more thread systems by mesh formation. Meshes in formed-loop- knits are formed by mutually interlocking loops of yarn. Wovens, in contrast, are fabrics consisting of perpendicularly intercrossing threads of two thread systems, warp threads and fill threads.
 Especially the use of textured fill threads in formed-loop knits as a pollen guard is thus new and is to be protected.
 The advantages of using a formed-loop knit as opposed to a woven fabric as a pollen guard reside in the intermeshing. The mutual interlocking of the meshes creates a fabric in which individual threads are fixed and their position cannot be changed by mechanical influences. This permits spacings on the order of 1 to 2 mm between the warp threads, for example of pillar stitch lappings joined together by inlaid fill threads in partial insertion with reversal points (cf. DIN 62050-2). True, spacings on this order of magnitude can also be realized in wovens, but wovens, owing to the intercrossing of the thread systems, are bereft of any fixation of the threads, so that these can be moved out of their position by mechanical influences. Since in the case of spacings of 1 to 2 mm the threads do not provide mutual support to each other, such a woven structure does not possess adequate stability.
 These relatively large spacings of warp threads and fill threads in partial insertion to join for example pillar stitch lappings together make it possible to produce formed-loop knits having sufficient task-commensurate structural stability which offer further advantages for use as a pollen guard.
 Advantages also result with regard to visual transparency. Incen of Switzerland, for example, is offering a pollen guard system for windows which consists of a fabric woven from polyamide filaments. The system provides filtration because the warp and fill filaments are spaced apart by 15 to 25 μm, ie the size range of allergologically relevant pollen. However, these small filament spacings distinctly reduce the visual transparency in that objects behind the pollen guard appear indistinct, if they are visible at all. The pollen guard formed-loop knit of the present invention, owing to the increased spacing of the warp threads in the form of pillar stitch lappings, provides a visual transparency which is distinctly better and thus offers task-relevant advantages.
 Another advantage of using a formed-loop knit instead of a woven fabric for pollen guard systems within the meaning of the invention to be protected is the load-extension response. The above-described structure is responsible for any stretching by a woven fabric in response to mechanical load being the result of a stretching of the filaments only. This stretching is mostly irreversible, depending on the elastic fraction of the filaments, and hence leads to a permanent deformation of the entire woven fabric.
 The intermeshed structure of a formed-loop knit makes it possible to achieve a load-extension response which is reversible and offers advantages for use as a pollen guard system. The reversible response to a mechanical load is attributable to the fact that, in a cloth construction for example, the wales describe a zigzag pattern. In the event of a mechanical load being applied in the direction of the wales and, a formed-loop knit does not generate a reversible stretch response by stretching of the filaments, but through straightening out of the zigzag course of the wales. The same applies to the preferred form of the present invention, pillar stitch lapping, since here the loops lengthen as it were when the pillar stitch structure is extended.
 The basis weight of the textile fabric is in the range from 30 to 200 g/m
 The filaments of the threads consist of a polyester and are continuous filaments from 1 to 100 μm, preferably from 1 to 50 μm and more preferably from 1 to 25 μm in diameter.
 The thread material is preferably from 50 to 500 μm and more preferably from 50 to 250 μm in diameter.
 The textured thread material has a linear density which is preferably in the range from 5 to 30 dtex and more preferably between 5 and 15 dtex.
 The warp threads of the formed-loop knit are lapped as a straight pillar stitch with a DIN 53883 wale density from 20 to 500 and preferably from 30 to 70 and a DIN 53883 course density from 20 to 600, preferably from 50 to 300 and more preferably from 100 to 250.
 Textured fill threads are inlaid in the pillar stitches, the number of threads per cm being in the range from 2 to 60, preferably in the range from 5 to 30 and more preferably in the range from 10 to 25.
 Fill threads in partial insertion join two pillar stitch lappings separated by one pillar stitch lapping together in a zigzag shape by joining two adjacent courses together.
 The pollen guard system is useful not only for windows in households but also for roof lights and door openings such as balcony and patio doors and the like. The problem of the door being impassable can be solved through a specific design of the attachment system. A further use is in relation to car windows to allow someone who is allergic to pollen to open the window during the summer months.
 Other embodiments for roof lights, as a permanent bed net or a simple-to-deinstall traveler's bed net form part of the inventive concept. Further embodiments of a pollen guard-consist in a system to be attached to a perambulator and also as a bed net for cots, as a conventional curtain or in a pollen guard roller blind which is only unrolled in front of the window when needed. Additional embodiments of a pollen guard result from using the pollen guard in roof vents, as in buses for example.
 A further embodiment of the pollen guard system consists in the manufacture of a wedgelike system which is fitted into the opening gap which appears when a tilt and turn window or door is tilted open. In addition, the pollen guard can be configured in such a way that in the case of pivoting wing windows, whose wings swing open on two horizontal central pivots, it may likewise be fitted in the resulting opening slots.
 Further embodiments of the pollen guard are the impositioning of the filter according to the present invention in a cutout in a foil or some other material by means of customary attachment techniques, for example for cost reasons or for framing, which is subsequently attached in front of the airing means, such as a window, to be covered. The present invention likewise comprises covering the pollen guard with a protector against mechanical stresses such as for example with a grid or a coarsely meshed woven fabric or the like.
 The invention further encompasses the use of the filter material in airconditioning means such as for example in the airing system for buildings, caravans or motor vehicles, including as a filter inset in window frame material or even in a cutout in a glass window pane itself. Further embodiments are in the leisure sector such as for example the use in tents or in front of boat cabin doors.
 An additional embodiment is constituted by the use of the filter material as a hood to protect the head or as means to protect the face, eyes, mouth or nose.
 Some attachment systems according to the present invention will now be more particularly described with reference to the example of attaching the pollen guard to windows without wishing to restrict the possible forms of attachment to this embodiment.
 The pollen guard system is attached to the outward grooves in the case of windows which pivot into the interior of the room and to the inward grooves in the case of windows which pivot outward.
 The mounting of the pollen guard system can be carried out in various ways. An example of an advantageous way is to attach it by means of a onesided adhesive mushroom tape. To this end, the mushroom tape is adhered into the groove of the window so that it frames the window opening to be fitted with the pollen guard system. The pollen guard formed-loop knit, after it has been trimmed to the size of the window, is pressed onto the mushroom tape and held in place by the mushrooms.
 Instead of a mushroom tape it is similarly possible to use a hook and loop tape in a further embodiment.
 A further embodiment of the attachment system consists in the use of adhesive materials such as for example onesided or doublesided adhesive tapes, varieties of other double-sided adhesive materials such as tesa® Power Strips or the adhering of the pollen guard by means of an adhesive only. Additional embodiments are constituted by the attaching of the pollen guard by means of nails, tacks, hooks, screws, bolts, clamps, buttons, press studs, paperclips or with the aid of a curtain rail. It is also conceivable to attach the pollen guard system via auxiliary struts which are situated in a seam at the edge of the pollen guard or secured thereto in some other way and which are fixed in clamping means attached to the frame of the window.
 Additional embodiments result due to the attachment of the pollen guard textile in a frame which is mounted in front of the air opening to be protected.
 Commercially available systems are for example plastics profiles which the user has to adapt to the individual size of the window case and which are subsequently assembled to form a frame.
 A further way to attach the pollen guard system is to use an additional mushroom tape which possesses a felty fabric. After the window frame has been equipped with the adhesive mushroom tape, the further mushroom tape is applied with the fleece side to the adhered mushroom tape, followed by the application of the pollen guard formed-loop knit. The advantage of using an additional mushroom tape is the easier demounting and remounting of the pollen guard for example at the end and on recommencement of the pollen season. Since the pollen guard formed-loop knit is individually cut to size by the user, it is additionally necessary for the loop-formingly knitted structure to be protected against damage to the loop-formingly knitted structure such as for example the inadvertent pulling out of the fill threads. The attaching of the fleece mushroom tape can provide a similar protective effect at the pollen guard formed-loop knit such as that of a seam. To apply the pollen guard loop-formed knit to doors, moreover, there is the advantage that the pollen guard formed-loop knit equipped with the fleece mushroom tape can be rolled up along the door groove in the applied state to enable passage through the door without the system having to be completely removed. Another conceivable way to make passage through the door possible is a vertical slot in the formed-loop knit that can be closed by means of a similarly constructed fleece mushroom tape system.
 The invention will now be illustrated by means of an example without wishing to restrict the invention in the process:
 The example which follows compares the filtering effect with regard to birch pollen of a formed-loop knit having textured fill threads with a formed-loop knit having no textured fill thread but even higher stitch density without wishing to restrict the invention to the example described. The methods of measurement used are also described.
 a) Comparison of Filtration Effect of Formed-Loop Knits with and without Textured Fill Thread
Formed-loop knit 1: Manufacturer: Mattes & Ammann Sample number: 30961 Material: Polyester Structure: Pillar stitch lapping with nontextured fill threads in partial insertion Nontextured fill thread inlaid into the pillar stitches zigzaggedly joins together two pillar stitches which are separated by one pillar stitch Stitch density: 39200 Basis weight: 85 g/m Filter effect v birch pollen F: 3% Formed-loop knit 2: Manufacturer: Velcro Europe Sample number: M 138 Material: Polyester Structure: Pillar stitch lapping with nontextured fill threads in partial insertion Nontextured fill thread zigzaggedly joins together two pillar stitches which are separated by one pillar stitch Textured fill threads inlaid into the pillar stitches Stitch density: 10 400 Basis weight: 43 g/m Filter effect v birch pollen F: 38%
 Formed-loop knit 1 has a significantly higher stitch density than formed-loop knit 2. Comparison of the results for the filter effect versus birch pollen shows for formed-loop knit 2 clearly the supporting influence of the textured fill threads within the meaning of the invention to be protected over the denser formed-loop knit 1.
 b) Description of Methods of Measurement Used
 Determination of Basis Weight
 The values reported in the table are manufacturer data.
 Determination of stitch density was determined according to DIN 53883. The measuring apparatus used was a Leica WILD M3Z stereomicroscope with associated line scale having a scale division value of 1 mm.
 Determination of Filtration Effect with Regard to Birch Pollen
 The principle of measurement is based on a simultaneous particle count by means of two particle counters.
 Birch pollen is atomized and introduced into an air flow through a tubular experimental setup by means of compressed air. The intake funnels of two commercially available particle counters, one of which is covered with the test pattern, while the other is left uncovered for reference, are situated at the point of exit from the housing. The particle counters simultaneously provide particle counts per measurement for the uncovered case and for the case covered with the test pattern. The two measured values can be used to calculate an individual value E for the filter effect of the sample:
 The filter effect with regard to birch pollen F reported in the examples is the result of ten individual measurements, owing to the very high standard deviation of the individual values. By alternating the intake funnel which is to be covered with the test pattern it is possible to dispense with the determination of the apparatus constant, which arises from incompletely homogeneous distribution of the pollen in the air flow and apparatus differences in the particle counters. The comparison limit of this method is 10%; that is, differences above 10% in the filter effect of the two samples are significant. Since the two particle counters also capture particles present in the indoor air, but it is not known how many indoor air particles are filtered, no correction was applied to the individual values. It can be estimated that, when the two measured values are diminished by the number of indoor air particles, the result for the individual value of the filter effect is higher better.
 The experimental setup consists of a tubular housing. At the point of air inlet is situated a blower to adjust the air flow through the tubular housing, this blower aspirating ambient air and conveying it through the housing. The intake funnels for the particle counters and also the cup wheel of an anemometer are situated at the air outlet. The birch pollen is introduced on the suction side of the blower.
 The tubular experimental setup is 1.6 m in length and 0.29 m in diameter for the circular cross section. The tube walls consist of aluminum sheet 1 mm in thickness.
 The air flow is realized by a blower which is sealingly attached to the housing inlet and which can continuously generate wind speeds of up to 5 m/s via closed loop control means. The diameter of the blower is flush with the diameter of the housing. This experimental apparatus was equipped with a Ziehl EBM ball bearing fan having a high air volume rate.
 The intake funnels for the particle counters and the cup wheel of the anemometer are mounted on the outermost radius of the exit opening from the housing and protrude into the exit housing by 3 to 4 cm. The intake funnels and the cup wheel are aligned parallel to the air flow. The exact positions of the intake funnels and of the cup wheel are illustrated with reference to the face of a timepiece. Viewed in the direction of flow, the intake funnels occupy the positions at 5:30 and 6:30 while the cup wheel is positioned at 7 o'clock.
 The particle counters used are a Partoscope R from Kratel and a 28DD particle monitor from Deha. Both instruments possess plural measuring channels for various particle size ranges. As a result, particle size ranges from above 0.3 to above 5 μm can be determined distributively and cumulatively for the Partoscope R counter and particle size ranges from about 0.3 to above 10 μm can be determined distributively and cumulatively for the 28DD counter. The measured values utilized for determining the filter effect constitute the particle numbers measured cumulatively for the range above 3 μm for both particle counters. The measuring time to determine the reference and comparative values was 60 s for both instruments.
 The air speed was measured using a mini air-IV anemometer from Schiltknecht Ing. The results of the tests were obtained at a wind speed of 3 m/s.
 The test substance used was natural birch pollen. Birch pollen has a size spectrum from about 10 μm to 30 μm in diameter and is approximately spherical. Birch pollen for medical purposes is available from Allergon of Sweden. The measured results were generated with the birch pollen species
 The birch pollen was introduced into the air stream by using compressed air to blow it out of a stock reservoir vessel, through a hose system and perpendicularly and centrally upstream of the suction side of the blower. To this end, about 0.001 g of birch pollen is weighed into a 100 ml ground joint conical flask used as a stock reservoir vessel. The conical flask is sealed with a gas inlet tube having a ground joint fitting that of the conical flask and an outlet opening.
 The compressed air supply is connected up to a three-way cock by means of a hose. The other two terminals of the three-way cock are connected via hoses to volume flow measuring means and to the inlet opening of the gas inlet tube in the conical flask. The outlet opening of the stock reservoir vessel is connected through a hose to a glass tube which is situated centrally and perpendicularly, directly above the suction side of the blower.
 The setting of the three-way cock determines whether the compressed air volume flow is measured or the compressed air is passed through the stock reservoir vessel to atomize the pollen. The measured results were obtained with the compressed air volume flow set to 15 l/min. To introduce pollen into the system, compressed air was passed through the stock reservoir vessel for 5 s during the abovementioned measuring time of 1 minute.
 The samples were attached in front of the intake funnels of the particle counters by adhering an approximately circularly round sample about 4.5 cm in diameter to a matching circularly round frame. The frame has been appropriately equipped with a doublesided adhesive tape. The adhesive tape used was tesa® 4965. Prior to particle measurement, the frame is pushed together with the sample over the intake funnel of one of the two particle counters.