Title:
Toilet
Document Type and Number:
United States Patent D802105

Inventors:
Stevenson, Robert Karl (London, GB)
Muspratt-williams, Alexander (London, GB)
Hahn, Mathias (London, GB)
Application Number:
29/566089
Publication Date:
11/07/2017
Filing Date:
05/26/2016
View Patent Images:
Assignee:
Kohler Mira Limited (Gloucestershire, GB)
Primary Class:
International Classes:
(IPC1-7): 2302
Field of Search:
D23/295-301, D23/303, D23/309, D23/313
US Patent References:
D763416ToiletAugust, 2016GoadD23/301
D764033ToiletAugust, 2016ChukD23/301
D694379Toilet tankNovember, 2013Bates
D672018ToiletDecember, 2012BucherD23/301
D637702Plumbing fixtureMay, 2011Rexach
D603945One-piece toiletNovember, 2009BucherD23/301
D536428Plumbing fixtureFebruary, 2007Kohler, Jr. et al.
D536771Plumbing fixtureFebruary, 2007Chenesseau
D496444ToiletSeptember, 2004Kergoet
D455202Water closetApril, 2002Soulier
D455477BidetApril, 2002Soulier
D437634Water closetFebruary, 2001HundleyD23/301
D412742Water closetAugust, 1999Soulier
D410279Water closetMay, 1999TaniD23/301
D398383BidetSeptember, 1998Kergoet
D393059ToiletMarch, 1998GarzaD23/301
D352772BidetNovember, 1994Kohler, Jr. et al.
D349156Water closetJuly, 1994Kohler, Jr. et al.
D332137BidetDecember, 1992Kohler, Jr. et al.
D323551Water closetJanuary, 1992FaitD23/301
D311242ToiletOctober, 1990Reid
D309939Water closetAugust, 1990Yvetot
Primary Examiner:
Spear, Robert M.
Assistant Examiner:
Voytek, John
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Foley & Larnder LLP
Claims:
CLAIM

1. We claim the ornamental design for a toilet, as shown and described.

Description:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the claimed design;

FIG. 2 is a front view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a rear view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a side view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is another side view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a top view of the embodiment of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the claimed design of FIG. 1.

The ornamental design which is claimed is shown in solid lines in the drawings. The broken lines in the drawings form no part of the claimed design. Broken lines formed by equal length dashes show unclaimed subject matter. Broken lines formed of unequal length dashes (i.e., dash-dot) define bounds of the claimed design.