Title:
Shredder
United States Patent D747406


Inventors:
Sweet, Christopher David (Chicago, IL, US)
Applegate, Shawn Michael (Wood Dale, IL, US)
Application Number:
29/468834
Publication Date:
01/12/2016
Filing Date:
11/22/2013
Assignee:
FELLOWES, INC. (Itasca, IL, US)
Primary Class:
International Classes:
(IPC1-7): 1804
Field of Search:
D18/34.3, D18/34.4, D18/34.5, D18/34.6, D18/34.9, D23/356, D23/359, D23/360, D23/364, 241/100, 241/236, 241/30, 241/36
View Patent Images:
US Patent References:
D724654ShredderMarch, 2015LabatD18/34.5
D705860ShredderMay, 2014ZhouD18/34.5
D695337ShredderDecember, 2013ChoiD18/34.5
D683439Air purifier including dehumidifierMay, 2013ChoiD23/364
20120018554SHREDDER AND METHOD OF SHREDDING PAPERJanuary, 2012Seo241/101.2
20100327091SAFETY SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING OPERATION OF OFFICE EQUIPMENTDecember, 2010Ko241/25
D616923ShredderJune, 2010KimD18/34.5
D616924ShredderJune, 2010KimD18/34.5
D615123Paper shredderMay, 2010GravesD18/34.5
D602073ShredderOctober, 2009HolderfieldD18/34.5
20090014565SHREDDER AUTO FEED SYSTEMJanuary, 2009Matlin241/222
D299148ShredderDecember, 1988NishiboriD18/19
D286051Line printerOctober, 1986NakanoD18/53



Foreign References:
EM000614136-0001December, 2006
EM002439810-0001July, 2014
EM002439810-0002July, 2014
EM002439810-0003July, 2014
Other References:
Guys Gab. . Apr. 1, 2014. Fellowes AutoMax Shredder.
YouTube. . Nov. 26, 2014. Fellowes AutoMax Auto Feed Shredders.
Primary Examiner:
Eland, Bridget L.
Assistant Examiner:
Mcvey, Lauren
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Claims:
CLAIM

1. The ornamental design for a shredder, as shown and described.

Description:

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shredder showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,

FIG. 7 is bottom plan view thereof.

The broken lines immediately adjacent to the shaded areas, encompassing unshaded regions, represent unclaimed boundaries of the claimed design while all other broken lines are directed to environment and are for illustrative purposes only; the broken lines form no part of the claimed design.