Pants
United States Patent D527866
US Patent References:
Telephone
Biala - December, 1992 - D331757

Trousers
Buziol - September, 1993 - D339220

Jean bean bag seat cushion
Alexander - October, 1994 - D351525

Pants with adjustable waist and length
Chung - November, 1996 - 5575010

Combination jeans and metallic ornament
Ezra - September, 1999 - 5956775


Inventors:
Fixel, Susan (Weston, FL, US)
Application Number:
D/242353
Publication Date:
09/12/2006
Filing Date:
11/09/2005
View Patent Images:
Assignee:
LTM International, Inc. (Sunrise, FL, US)
Primary Class:
Other Classes:
D02/857
International Classes:
(IPC1-7): 0202
Field of Search:
2/247-254, 2/231-238, 2/227, D2/716, D2/712-714, 2/72, D2/742-748, 2/911, 2/76, 2/22, 2/71, 2/23, D2/857, 2/919, 2/69, 2/79, 2/DIG.2, 2/228, 2/2.17, 2/221
US Patent References:
D436714TrousersJanuary, 2001KorffD2/742
D460603Element of article of clothingJuly, 2002LaberD2/853
6421831Ergonomic garmentsJuly, 2002Korff2/69
D491712Pair of trousersJune, 2004MorissetD2/742
D511606JeansNovember, 2005CaucciD2/742
7014662Vintage fading method for jeansMarch, 2006Mei et al.8/102
Foreign References:
AU151372April, 2003
BE0976865February, 2000
EP1502513February, 2005Trousers with elasticated band used to support the user's buttocks
FR2784551April, 2000
IT000346929-0036December, 2005
Primary Examiner:
Murphy, Celia A.
Assistant Examiner:
Johnson R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster & Russell, PA
Kim, Esq. Stanley A.
Claims:
CLAIM

1. I claim the ornamental design for pants, as shown and described.

Description:

FIG. 1 is a front view of pants showing my new design in a flattened condition;

FIG. 2 is a rear view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a left side view thereof, shown expanded to the position of use;

FIG. 4 is a right side view of FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a top plan view of FIG. 3;

FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view of FIG. 3; and,

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of FIG. 3.

The broken lines shown in FIGS. 2, 3, and 5-7 represent portions of the design that form no part of the claim. The broken lines themselves, and the areas within them, also form no part of the claim.