Title:
Set of cue racks or similar article
United States Patent D275534
US Patent References:
/D120343.html
Hopkins - May, 1940 - D120343

/D198691.html
Schaefer - July, 1964 - D198691

/D209682.html
Williams - December, 1967 - D209682

/D242097.html
O'Neal - November, 1976 - D242097

Rack for spice containers
Morin - July, 1979 - D252429


Inventors:
Halverson, Lance K. (7301 27th Ave. NW., Seattle, WA, 98117)
Application Number:
D/395580
Publication Date:
09/18/1984
Filing Date:
07/06/1982
View Patent Images:
Primary Class:
Field of Search:
D6/114, D6/125, D6/157, 211/13, 211/14, 211/60R, 211/60A, 211/60T, 211/87, 211/88, 248/220.3, 248/220.4, 248/221.1, 248/221.2
US Patent References:
2371433Tool supporting rackMarch, 1945Davis211/60T
2815863Garden tool standDecember, 1957Larson211/60A
2974804Tool holderMarch, 1961Maro211/60T
3491893STEMWARE BRACKETJanuary, 1970Morris211/60R
3650407RACK FOR SPORTING EQUIPMENTMarch, 1972Benham211/87
3698563BASEBALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE RACKOctober, 1972Gordon et al.211/13
3871526TOWEL RACK FOR USE ON BEACHESMarch, 1975Marsack211/89
4049126Weight equalized foldable bat rackSeptember, 1977HalversonD6/125
Other References:
Rolf Sporting Goods, Inc., Prior 40 2/7/79, LD10 bar rack.
Primary Examiner:
Bullock B. J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Moravan, Gregory W.
Mollick, Don R.
Claims:
1. The ornamental design for a set of cue racks or similar article, as shownand described.

Description:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a set of cue racks or similar article showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the upper rack of FIG. 1 shown separately for ease of illustration, the supporting bracket under the lower rack being identical;

FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a bottom perspective view of a second embodiment of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being the supporting bracket, again the upper rack is shown separately for ease of illustration;

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a third embodiment of the design of FIG. 1, the only differences residing in the straight sides and the front edge;

FIG. 7 is a side elevational view of the upper rack of the fourth embodiment of the design of FIG. 1, the only differences being the straight sides, the front edge and the supporting bracket.

The pool cue illustrated in broken lines in FIGS. 1 and 6 does not comprise a part of my new design.