| 5908707 | Cleaning articles comprising a high internal phase inverse emulsion and a carrier with controlled absorbency | Cabell et al. | 428/537.5 | |
| 6190678 | Cleansing and conditioning products for skin or hair with improved deposition of conditioning ingredients | Hasenoehrl et al. | 424/401 | |
| 6258368 | Antimicrobial wipes | Beerse et al. | 424/404 | |
| 6287583 | Low-pH, acid-containing personal care compositions which exhibit reduced sting | Warren et al. | 424/404 |
| JPA092960 | ||||
| JP3040661 | COSMETIC |
2. Technical Field
The present invention relates to protective silk cloths, adapted to be applied to affected body parts, such as cuts, burns, tumors, bedsores, and the like, to protect such affected parts.
2. Background Technology
Protecting affected parts with protective silk cloths is known to the public by means of Utility Model Registration Nos. 3,040,123 and 3,040,661 that were devised by the inventor of the present patent application.
Conventional protective silk cloths of the prior art have the feature of not causing a patient to feel self conscious with their use because of excellent conformability of silk itself to the skin, and because of virulence absorbability of silk which absorbs substances detrimental to cure, such as humidity, suppuration, direct, and the like, thereby contributing to improvement in the curing effects of affected parts. However, because of a lack of antibacterial properties, such protective silk cloths are likely to cause suppuration in the affected body parts, such as cuts, burns, bedsores, and the like, unless treatment, such as applying an antibacterial agent and the like, is separately provided to the affected body parts.
The present invention is made to solve the problem described above. Thus, an object of the present invention is to provide a protective silk cloth having antibacterial properties.
In order to achieve the object described above, the present invention provides a protective cloth for affected body parts, comprising a piece of silk fabric containing an extract of
The silk fabric may be knitted or woven fabric made by knitting or weaving raw silk or spun silk yarn, or non-woven fabric made by twisting floss silk, or the like, into a fabric-like texture. The protective silk cloth for affected body pars may also comprise a piece of this silk fabric, such as floss silk, or the like, adhered by means of adhesive, to a piece of non-woven fabric made of either cellulose (produced from wooden pulp, or the like), a polyester, a polyurethane, or the like, or to a piece of non-woven fabric made of cellulose, reinforced with a polyurethane or the like.
For the parabenzoic ester, a solution may be used of either n-butyl-p-hydroxybenzoic acid or n-propyl-p-hydroxybenzoic acid, both well known as an antibacterial agent, mixed with an alcohol, such as ethanol.
For
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:
As shown in
In addition to the conformability to the skin and the absorbability of the silk itself, a protective cloth manufactured as described above contains one or more from
These protective cloths, mainly made of such natural materials, and protective cloths, made of synthetic materials not including vinyl chloride, are inexpensive and, furthermore, are capable of being disposed as waste without causing environmental pollution.
As described above, in addition to the conformability to the skin and the virulence absorbability for absorbing humidity, suppuration, and the like, of silk itself, the protective silk cloth according to the present invention exhibits especially strong antibacterial properties against
Next, the present invention will be discussed based on antibacterialness tests.
In the tests, sample floss silk is cut out to obtain circular disks of about a 2-cm diameter, which are then put in respective Petri dishes separately, as specimens. After test bacteria solution of 0.1 ml (milliliter) is dripped on the testing surface of each specimen, each dish has its cover secured and is preserved for 19 hours under the conditions of 35 degrees C. (deg.C.) temperature and 90% relative humidity. After the preservation, each specimen is washed out using sterile, physiological salt solution of 1.9 ml, to obtain a recovery solution. With the recovery solution, the number of live bacteria is measured by means of the agar plating method (cultivation for 24 hours at 35 deg.C.) using normal agar. In case no bacteria are detected, the number of bacteria after preservation is denoted as “<50.”
Test bacteria solution described herein is obtained by transplanting test bacteria to an SCD cultivation medium for subsequent precultivation for nine hours at 35 deg.C., and thereafter diluting the precultivation solution with sterile, physiological salt solution so as to obtain the number of bacteria equal to 10
[Illustrative Embodiment 1 (
As shown in Table 1, floss silk was soaked in five different types of test solutions, respectively, and dried after the soaking, to obtain Specimens No.1-No.5. Untreated floss silk was denoted as Specimen No.6.
| TABLE 1 | |
| Speci- | |
| men | Test Solution |
| No. 1 | |
| No. 2 | Ethanol containing n-butyl-p-hydroxybenzoic acid by 10% |
| (also referred to as 10%-butyl-parabenzoic-ester ethanol); | |
| No. 3 | Ethanol containing n-butyl-p-hydroxybenzoic acid by 20% |
| (also referred to as 20%-butyl-parabenzoic-ester ethanol); | |
| No. 4 | Ethanol containing n-propyl-p-hydroxybenzoic acid by 10% |
| (also referred to as 10%-propyl-parabenzoic-ester ethanol); | |
| No. 5 | Ethanol containing n-propyl-p-hydroxybenzoic acid by 20% |
| (also referred to as 20%-propyl-parabenzoic-ester ethanol); and | |
| No. 6 | Untreated. |
Antibacterialness tests were applied to each specimen by means of
| TABLE 2 | |||
| A Result of Measuring the Number of Live Bacteria | |||
| Speci- | |||
| men | (Test Solution) | A | B |
| No. 1 | ( | 4.60 × 10 | <50 |
| No. 2 | (10%-butyl-parabenzoic-ester ethanol) | Same | 8.0 × 10 |
| No. 3 | (20%-butyl-parabenzoic-ester ethanol) | Same | <50 |
| No. 4 | (10%-propyl-parabenzoic-ester ethanol) | Same | <50 |
| No. 5 | (20%-propyl-parabenzooic-ester | Same | <50 |
| ethanol) | |||
| No. 6 | (Untreated) | Same | 3.30 × 10 |
| | |||
From Table 2, it was confirmed that Specimens Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5, containing
[Illustrative Embodiment 2 (
As shown in Table 3, Specimen No.7 was obtained by having floss silk soaked in a 1-in-6 diluted
| TABLE 3 | ||
| Specimen | Test Solution | |
| No. 7 | 1-in-6 diluted | |
| No. 8 | 1-in-6 diluted | |
| No. 9 | Mixture solution; and | |
| No. 10 | Untreated. | |
Antibacterialness tests were applied to these specimens by means of
| TABLE 4 | |||
| Specimen | (Test Solution) | A | B |
| No. 7 | (1-in-6 diluted | 8.10 × 10 | <50 |
| No. 8 | (No. 7 Test Solution, further gas | Same | <50 |
| sterilized) | |||
| No. 9 | (Mixture solution) | Same | <50 |
| No. 10 | (Untreated) | Same | 1.90 × 10 |
| | |||
Table 4 confirms that Specimens Nos. 7 and 8, containing the 1-in-6 diluted
[Illustrative Embodiment 3 (
As shown in Table 5, Specimen No.11 was obtained by having floss silk soaked in a 1-in-6 diluted
| TABLE 5 | ||
| Specimen | Test Solution | |
| No. 11 | 1-in-6 diluted | |
| No. 12 | 1-in-6 diluted | |
| No. 13 | Mixture solution; and | |
| No. 14 | Untreated. | |
Antibacterialness tests were applied to these specimens by means of
| TABLE 6 | |||
| Specimen | (Test Solution) | A | B |
| No. 11 | (1-in-6 diluted | 4.00 × 10 | <50 |
| No. 12 | (No. 7 Test Solution) (further gas | Same | 9.6 × 10 |
| sterilized) | |||
| No. 13 | (Mixture solution) | Same | <50 |
| No. 14 | (Untreated) | Same | 8.70 × 10 |
| | |||
From Table 6, it was confirmed that Specimen No.11 containing the 1-in-6 diluted
[Illustrative Embodiment 4 (
As shown in Table 7, Specimen No.15 was obtained by having floss silk soaked in a 1-in-6 diluted
| TABLE 7 | ||
| Specimen | Test Solution | |
| No. 15 | 1-in-6 diluted | |
| No. 16 | 1-in-6 diluted | |
| No. 17 | Mixture solution; and | |
| No. 18 | Untreated. | |
Antibacterialness tests were applied to these specimens by means of
| TABLE 8 | |||
| Specimen | (Test Solution) | A | B |
| No. 15 | (1-in-6 diluted | 1.10 × 10 | 9.50 × 10 |
| No. 16 | (No. 7 Test Solution) (further gas | Same | 9.00 × 10 |
| sterilized) . . . | |||
| No. 17 | (Mixture solution) | Same | <50 |
| No. 18 | (Untreated) | Same | 1.60 × 10 |
From Table 8, it was confirmed that Specimen No.17, containing the mixture solution of the 1-in-10 diluted
It is noted that the tests with the 1-in-6 diluted