Title:
FLUID PRESSURE SYSTEM FOR CONVERTING DIGITAL SIGNALS TO ANALOG SIGNALS
United States Patent 3827457


Abstract:
A fluid pressure system for converting a digital pressure signal into an analog pressure by control of fluid pressure passing through at least a pair of restrictors in series and by monitoring the pressure between the two restrictors each one of which may be characterized by a subsonic or sonic flow rate therethrough so as to produce any combination of such flow rates therebetween, depending upon the input pressure and the cross-sectional area and geometric configuration of said restrictors.



Inventors:
Vutz, Norman (Radnor, PA)
Brown, Donald (Monroeville, PA)
Application Number:
05/372849
Publication Date:
08/06/1974
Filing Date:
06/22/1973
Assignee:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO,US
Primary Class:
International Classes:
F15B5/00; B60T13/66; F15B11/042; F15C1/00; F15C4/00; G05D16/00; (IPC1-7): G05D7/03; F15C3/00
Field of Search:
137/561,599,599.1,601 91
View Patent Images:
US Patent References:
3726296FLUIDIC CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALIBRATING SAME1973-04-10Friedland et al.
3081942Digital-to-analog control system1963-03-19MaClay
3072146Digital regulator valve1963-01-08Gizeski
2229903Metering valve1941-01-28Schmohl et al.



Primary Examiner:
Cline, William R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Mcintire Jr., Ralph W.
Claims:
Having now described the invention, what we claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is

1. A control pressure pilot valve device for converting a digital pressure to an analog control pressure transmitted to a control device for operation thereof, said pilot valve device comprising:

2. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the dimensions of the flow area of one or more of said upstream restrictors are different from the others.

3. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 2, further characterized by operator's control means for effecting selective operation of said upstream and downstream valve devices.

4. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 3, wherein said operator's control means comprises an electrical controller incorporating a binary code system and including a control panel for selecting the desired code and consequent combination of valve operation.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In fluid pressure operable systems wherein valve devices are employed for effecting supply of control pressure at varying degrees to other fluid pressure operable devices, such as in a railway train brake system, for example, wherein a manually operable engineer's brake valve is operable to a plurality of positions for effecting supply of control fluid, at a preselected degree, to the relay portion of the brake control valve, the degree of such control pressure thus delivered to the brake control valve should be highly accurate in order to avoid overbraking or underbraking of the train. The engineer's brake valve device noramlly includes a manually operable handle which the operator moves to a selected position, according to his experience and judgment, that will effect delivery of control pressure at the desired degree. Although the operator's experience normally permits him to operate the brake valve with a high degree of accuracy in effecting delivery of control pressure at the desired degree, there is no positive assurance that such will occur with each operation, especially in the case of an operator with little experience.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The object of the present invention, therefore, is to provide apparatus for supplying control fluid at a precise, measured pressure, said apparatus being characterized in that it may be operated without the necessity of judgment in the part of the operator in positioning an operating handle.

Basically, the invention comprises a plurality of control pressure supply restrictors, either of identical flow rate capacities or of various flow rate capacities, connected in parallel relation to each other between an upstream source of control fluid at a contant preselected pressure and a downstream atmospheric restrictor. Respective individually operable cut-off valve devices, which may be of the type operated manually or of the type operated by remote controlled power means, are connected to the downstram side of each of the supply restrictors in interposed relation between each of said supply restrictors so that one or more of said supply restrictors may be cut out or cut in, as desired, to produce the desired control pressure which is tapped off between said atmospheric restrictor and a common conduit connected to all of said supply restrictors and leading to the device to be supplied with such control pressure. A cut-off valve similar to those above described may be connected to the downstream or outlet side of the atmospheric restrictor for further control of the pressure tapped off via the common conduit for the device to be controlled thereby. The apparatus may be constructed in the form of a manifold in which the several cut-off valves may be disposed and in which the several restrictors may be machined according to specified dimensions and cross-sectional configuration.

In the drawing, FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic of the basic principle of operation of the invention; FIG. 2 is also a diagrammatic of a further development of the basic illustration shown in FIG. 1; and FIG. 3 is a sectional view of a digitial to analog pressure converter device embodying the invention.

DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION

For purposes of illustrating the basic principle of the invention, FIG. 1 diagrammatically shows an upstream restrictor or choke member 1 connected in series to a downstream restrictor or choke member 2 by means of conduits 3, 4 and 5. In this case, fluid at a constant preselected pressure, flowing in the direction indicated by the arrows, is supplied to conduit 3 and flows through restrictor 1, through conduit 4, and through restrictor 5 to atmosphere. A tap-off conduit 6 is connected to conduit 4 between the two restrictors 1 and 2. Thus the volume between restrictors 1 and 2, as tapped by conduit 6, reflects an analog pressure resulting from the digital pressure supplied at conduit 3. By varying the flow areas of the upstream and downstream restrictors 1 and 2, respectively, it is possible to obtain various combinations of sonic/subsonic flow rates through the restrictors.

Depending upon the cross-sectional dimension and the effective pressure at the source, restrictors may be classified as sonic or subsonic.

If the restrictor is subsonic, the flow rate thereof depends upon the square root of the pressure differential across the restrictor. This condition may be represented by the formula R = C√ΔP, where R is the flow rate of the restrictor, C is a constant determined by the geometric cross-sectional configuration of the restrictor, and ΔP is the pressure differential across the restrictor. The pressure output, or Po, of a subsonic restrictor is always greater than one half the pressure input, or Pi, or expressed mathematically, Po >Pi /2.

If the restrictor is sonic, the flow rate thereof depends on the upstream pressure only, assuming the temperature to be constant. This condition may be represented by the formula R = kP, where R is the flow rate, k is a constant determined by the physical characteristics of the restrictor (such as the dimensions, geometric configuration, surface conditions, the effects of temperature, etc.), and P is the pressure input. The pressure output, or Po, of a sonic restrictor is always less than one half the pressure input, or Pi, or expressed mathematically, Po <Pi /2.

It should be noted, however, that even though the respective values of both constants C and k, as above set forth, depend on corresponding physical features of the restrictors, in the case where several restrictors having identical physical features are involved, the respective values of the constants C and k will not necessarily be the same but will differ between sonic and subsonic flow rate conditions.

The subject matter and the related formulae contained in the three paragraphs immediately preceding may be confirmed by reference to Vol. 73, pages 639 through 647 of the Transactions of ASME, 1951, under the title of Discharge Coefficients of Small-Diameter Orifices and Nozzles by H. P. Grace & C. E. Lapple.

By interposing an on-off upstream valve device 7 and an on-off downstream valve device 8 in pipes 4 and 5 downstream of restrictors 1 and 2, respectively, as shown in FIG. 2, digital control is obtained. If the downstream valve device 8 is shut off, an analog pressure at one limit, that is at a pressure equal to the constant source pressure in pipe 3 is produced in the tap-off pipe 6. The analog pressure in pipe 6 may be read on a pressure gauge 9 connected thereto. By closing upstream valve 7 and opening downstream valve 8, flow through restrictor 1 is stopped and the volume comprising pipes 4 and 6 is vented via restrictor 2 to produce an analog pressure at a second limit equal to atmosphere. By opening both valves 7 and 8 an analog pressure between the two limits is obtained, the value of such analog pressure thus obtained being dependent upon the relationship between the flow areas of the upstream and downstream restrictors 1 and 2 as well as the respective upstream pressure of each of said restrictors to determine the sonic/subsonic combination produced. The pressure limits obtainable for the four sonic/subsonic combinations possible with two restrictors in series are as follows:

TYPE OF FLOW THROUGH THE RESTRICTORS LIMITS OF ANALOG PRESSURE UPSTREAM RESTRICTOR DOWNSTREAM RESTRICTOR LOWEST HIGHEST __________________________________________________________________________ (a) Subsonic Subsonic 1 atmosphere <Po <Pi ( b) Sonic Subsonic 1 atmosphere <Po <Pi /2 (c) Subsonic Sonic 2 atmospheres <Po <Pi -( d) Sonic Sonic 2 atmospheres <Po <Pi /2 __________________________________________________________________________

In considering combination (a), for example, in which both the upstream restrictor 1 and the downstream restrictor 2 are subsonic, it should be apparent that Pi could be adjusted downwardly to approach one atmosphere (but not actually reduced to one atmosphere, otherwise there would be no flow). For purposes of convenience, however, this Pi will be called one atmosphere. If the constriction of downstream restrictor 2 is reduced to a point just short of that point at which an increase of Pi from one atmosphere up to a Pi just short of producing a sonic flow through the upstream restrictor 1, then the highest possible Po for a subsonic/subsonic combination of the restrictors 1 and 2, respectively, would approach Pi, since, as above noted, Po <Pi /2. For convenience, therefore, it is said that the highest limit of output or Po in the subsonic/subsonic combination is input pressure or Pi.

In considering combination (b), that is when upstream restrictor 1 is sonic and downstream restrictor 2 is subsonic, the lowest possible Pi can be close to one atmosphere (that is, just above one atmosphere, as above discussed). Pi can then be increased from one atmosphere up to a pressure just short of causing the downstream restrictor 2 to go into a sonic flow rate. In this case, since the pressure leaving the upstream restrictor 1, which is sonic, must be less than Pi /2, the upper limit of analog pressure at gauge 9 can only approach Pi /2.

By applying similar logic to cases (c) and (d) in the above table, one skilled in the art can readily understand how the lower and upper analog pressure limits are derived for each case.

The principles relating to restrictors, as above described, may be applied to a device, which may be called a pilot device, used in providing a control pressure to a second operating or control device. If the characteristic of the control device is such as to require a wide range of analog control pressures, it would not be practical to try to provide said wide range of control pressure by varying the respective flow areas of the two restrictors 1 and 2. If, for example, it is desired to replace an engineer's brake valve in a railway brake system with a more compact pilot valve device of equivalent versility and of the type herein described and embodying the invention, such a device may be like the one shown in FIG. 3.

As shown in FIG. 3, the pilot valve device may comprise a casing having a restrictor section 10 and a valve section 11, the two sections being sealingly joined by any suitable means not shown. The restrictor section 10 has disposed therein a plurality or preselected number of upstream restrictors R1, R2, R3, etc. having the input ends thereof connected in parallel relation via a passageway 12 to a common source of constant pressure, in this case a feed pipe 13 of the brake system.

The output ends of the restrictors R1, R2, R3, etc. are connected to respective inlet ends of upstream flow control valve devices V1, V2, V3, etc. of the open-closed type disposed in valve section 11, said valve devices having the outlet ends thereof connected in parallel relation via a passageway 14 to a downstream restrictor 15 which, in turn, is connected serially to the inlet of a downstream flow control valve device 16, both said downstream restrictor and downstream valve device also being disposed in valve section 11. The outlet side of downstream valve device 16 is connected to a pipe 18 leading to a device such as the relay valve portion (not shown) of the brake control valve device (not shown).

If all the parallel connected upstream restrictors R1, R2, R3, etc. are of identical flow area, then the analog pressure delivered via pipe 18 may be progressively increased by sequentially opening the appropriate upstream control valves V1, V2, V3, etc. This simulates varying the flow area of a single restrictor in a step wise fashion to produce the desired analog pressure between the upstream and downstream restrictors, said analog pressure being fed via pipe 18 to the relay valve of the brake control valve, which in turn, as is well known to those skilled in the art, controls brake pipe pressure for applying or releasing the train brakes.

Since discrete steps of brake pipe pressure control are effected in the manner above described, a binary digital method of controlling operation of the valves V1, V2, V3, etc. would possibly provide a very practical means of approaching a pure analog control pressure which is essential in obtaining smooth variations of brake pipe pressure control. The number of pressure levels obtainable with the pilot valve device shown in FIG. 3 is 2n-1, where n indicates the number of upstream restrictors. The respective values of the pressure increments comprising a pressure level is determined by the respective restrictor sizes and the valves opened for effecting the resultant upstream to downstream flow range.

It should be apparent that the upstream restrictors R1, R2, R3, etc., as well as the downstream restrictor 15, do not have to be of identical dimension. The dimensions and the number of the several restrictors may vary according to the specifications of the application of the invention. It should also be noted, however, that the total flow area resulting from the restrictor or combination of restrictors, as effected by the binary control logic, should be such as to produce pressure steps of fairly close values so as to allow a smooth transition from one pressure level to the next.

Control of the upstream valves V1, V2, V3, etc. may be effected in the desired binary fashion by any suitable well known manual, electrical, or fluid pressure means. An electrical valve controller 19 connected by multiple-wire conductors 20 and 21 to the several valve devices V1, V2, V3, etc., and incorporating a binary code system, for example, is represented symbolically in the drawing, it being considered that such control means are so well known in the art that a detailed description thereof is not deemed essential to an understanding of the invention. The controller 19 is provided with a control panel 22 which the operator uses in selecting any combination of the valves V1, V2, V3, etc. that he desires to operate in effecting the described analog control pressure.