Plaque It!
Sponsored by: Flash of Genius |
[0001] The present application is a continuation-in-part application from and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/000,227 filed Nov. 30, 2001 and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/294,426 filed Nov. 14, 2002 both entitled “Compensated Color Management Systems and Methods,” both applications having Jianmin Chen, Michael G. Robinson, Jonathon R. Birge, and Gary D. Sharp, as inventors, and having as assignee ColorLink, Inc., the assignee of the present application. These applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
[0002] The present invention relates generally to color management in projection displays and, more particularly, to color management architectures for three-panel projection systems that utilize color selective polarization filters (CSPF) and polarizing beam splitting (PBS) elements.
[0003] It is generally desirable for projection systems to produce high quality images while being compact and inexpensive. In prior art transmissive systems using polysilicon liquid crystal panels, high contrast is achieved by situating each panel between crossed sheet polarizers. Color management beam splitters/combiners and other optics are external to these units, insuring that polarization is not contaminated and contrast degraded.
[0004] In projection systems using reflective panels, such as liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) displays, beam routing is frequently accomplished using polarizing beam splitters. PBSs are four-port devices, comprising an input port, an output port, and a reflective panel port, with the fourth port typically unused. The behavior of thin-film PBS cubes, for instance, is such that s-polarized light is reflected, while orthogonal, p-polarized light is substantially transmitted.
[0005] A number of four-panel or “quad” architectures have been described in prior applications such as U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/736,105, and 10/294,426, for the separation, modulation, and re-combination of three primary colors. These functions may be accomplished using new architectures for color management that are described in the present application.
[0006] The present invention relates to color management architectures in video projection systems. Specifically, the described architectures employ three polarizing beamsplitter cubes (PBSs) and a dichroic beamsplitter to achieve color separation and recombination of red, green and blue primary color bands to illuminate and project light from three reflective video display panels. Color separation and recombination with the PBSs is achieved through polarization encoding of the separate color bands by color selective polarization filters. These architectures further provide for systems in which the constituent PBSs are used to analyze the reflected light and which do not require external polarizing elements for light analysis. Two of the three display panels are analyzed in transmission by their neighboring PBSs, whereas the third panel, which shares a PBS with another, is analyzed in transmission by the output PBS.
[0007] For the above-described color management architectures, the three display panels are placed in an ‘L’ shaped three cube assembly whose output port is defined. Unlike prior three-panel/three-PBS architectures, which “notch” out the green spectrum from between the red and blue spectrums for individual manipulation by a PBS/display panel couplet, see, e.g., U.S. patent application No. 2002/0001135, certain of the present architectures separate either blue or red first, leaving colors from adjacent wavelength bands to be manipulated between two panels by a single PBS. To accomplish this management of adjacent color bands through a single PBS, the present application recognizes the ability to mismatch color selective polarization filters to avoid color cross-talk in the region between the adjacent color bands. This allows blue light, for example to be treated separately to improve its contrast, which is an advantage because in many color management systems, blue contrast is often the most difficult to control. Other advantages of routing colors of adjacent wavelength bands to be manipulated between two panels by a single PBS include being able to tailor more effectively the PBS performance to the color bands that are then continuous in wavelength.
[0008] In addition to the adjacent color management techniques described above, the present invention can incorporate skew-ray compensating filters, such as described in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/000,227, which is incorporated by reference in the present application. The use of these skew-ray compensating filters in the disclosed, particularly between adjacent PBSs and particularly in physically compact, high angle illumination (low f/#) implementations, can increase system performance.
[0009]
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019] The incident light
[0020]
[0021] The projection device
[0022] The input light beam
[0023] The reflected first spectrum of light is then incident upon the PBS
[0024] The second spectrum of light, which is transmitted through the dichroic input beam splitter
[0025] The wavelengths of light in the transition region between the first and second portions of the second reflected light beam are defined in the absence of any external notch filtering by the transitions of filters
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029] A red/cyan filter
[0030] “ANSI contrast,” is a performance metric for comparing the contrast between a light part of a display and a dark part. The problem monitored with ANSI contrast measurement is the reflection back into a projection system of light from portions of a panel that correspond to bright areas in the display. Typically, the light coming off the bright areas of the panel can be reflected back into the projection device and light up the dark areas of the panel, which can result in increasing the intensity of the display's dark areas. One solution to avoid the unwanted reflections is to change the polarization of the reflected light. In the present example, when a part of the green panel is bright and a part of it is dark, the projected green light from the bright areas of the panel heads towards the projection lens (not shown) and is reflected back from the surfaces of elements within the projection lens. If the reflected green light has the same polarization as the incident light, then it travels back to the green panel where it can illuminate dark regions of the green panel with the incorrect polarization. This light can then be projected onto the screen, increasing the light level of the dark display regions and reducing ANSI contrast. To a viewer, low ANSI contrast results in a “washed out” appearance.
[0031] For example, to prevent green reflected light from hitting dark parts of any panel, the quarter-wave plate
[0032]
[0033]
[0034] The performance of the green panel
[0035]
[0036] In projection systems that use cubes as beam splitting elements, there exists a geometric symmetry that can be solved by a retarder-based compensation scheme. The compensation components are sandwiched between cubes that have reflecting surfaces that are at 45 degrees to the beam propagation direction, and can be parallel or orthogonal. Retarder based compensators between cubes act to transform polarization through rotation or reflection for the parallel or orthogonal reflecting surface situations respectively. In a four-cube system or a five-cube system, retarder stacks are placed between the cubes and can be used as skew ray compensators if they have these transformation properties. In a three-cube system such as projection device
[0037]
[0038] The embodiments described above provide an efficient means of splitting and recombining color channels while maintaining good polarization and high contrast. These embodiments are configured to achieve very high sequential contrast and enhance other system performance criteria such as:
[0039] 1. ANSI contrast—by reducing reflection surfaces in the projection path;
[0040] 2. Soft focus—by reducing non-phase flat components and reflecting surfaces in the projection path;
[0041] 3. The sequential contrast of a color—by isolating the color channel (e.g., blue);
[0042] 4. Physical compactness—by introducing a 90° angle between input and output transmission axes;
[0043] 5. Brightness at high white color temperatures—by increasing blue transmission; and
[0044] 6. Durability—by removing the output absorbing sheet polarizer.
[0045] Further embodiments may act to improve upon some or all of these performance criteria.
[0046] The system performance criteria may be improved at the expense of sequential photopic contrast and component specification. Such improvements may be incorporated since PBS cubes with improved transmission of p-polarized light are commercially available and since sequential contrast may not be limiting when compared with off state color and ANSI contrast.
[0047] Exemplary light sources include ultra-high pressure mercury arc lamps with a small arc size such as is available from Ushio, Toshiba, Perkin-Elmer, Phoenix and others. These light sources are rich in green and blue light but are lacking in red light. These or any suitable light source may be used to provide light for the systems discussed above. Additionally, these light sources produce substantial amounts of UV light, which may degrade organic materials such as polycarbonate films. Specific embodiments covered in this patent isolate the blue channel, which is most likely to contain the possibly damaging UV light. In these cases, inorganic half-wave plates such as those made from quartz can be used between PBSs DICHROIC BEAM SPLITTER Property Typical Range<
/td> Units Comments Glass substrate 1.52 1.5-2.0 — BK7. index Size 40 × 40 × 1 N/A mm Average 99
80-100 % Averaged over the reflection of s- input illumination polarized blue ray set. light (Rs) 430-470 nm Average 97 95-100 transmission of s-polarized Green light (Ts) 550-570 nm Red Ts 97 95-100 % 600-
680 nm
[0048]
YELLOW TRIM TRANSMITTING DICHROIC Property Typical R
ange Units Comments Blue 1 0-2 % transmission 430-490 nm Green 96 94-100<
/td> % transmission 530-600 nm Red 97 95-100 % transmission 600-680 nm 50% 515 505-525 nm transmission
[0049]
RED CYAN FILTER Property Typical Range<
/td> Units Comments Blue Crossed <2 <10 % Not critical polarizer - transmission 430-480 nm (Bx) Gx (530-560 nm) 0.5 0-0.7 %
Rx (615-680 nm) 98.5 97-100 % B
lue parallel- >95 >90% % N
ot critical polarizer transmi
ssion (Bp) Gp 98
td> 96-100 % Rp 98 <
td>96-100% Yellow 50% 600 595-605 nm <
td>point General This may be a free-standing part with Comments anti-reflective coatings evaporated directly onto the polycarbonate.
[0050]
RED GREEN PBS Property Typical Range<
/td> Units Comments Glass index 1.85 1.5-2.0 — A low coefficient (e.g., PBH56) of optical elasticity reduces stress induced birefringence. Size 22 × 22 × 28 N/A mm Blue Tp 90 80-100 % Not critical 430-520 nm Yellow Tp 96 94-100 % 530-
680 nm Blue Ts 1 <2 % Not critical Yellow Ts 0.1 <0.2 % 53
0-680 nm External Input and panels ports may be antireflective coated for surfaces <0.5% reflection over the visible spectrum.
[0051]
MAGNETA GREEN FILTER Property Typical Range<
/td> Units Comments Blue Crossed Don't care D/C polarizer - (D/C) transmission <
td>430-480 nm (Bx) Gx (530-560 nm) 1 0-2 % Rx (615-680 nm) 98 97-99 % Blue
parallel- D/C D/C polarizer
transmission (Bp) Gp 97 96-99 % Rp 0.25 0-0.5 % Cyan 50% 520 <530 nm
point Yellow 50% 570 565-575 nm
point General This filter may be bonded between glass Comments substrates with conforming glue, such as silicone, and then the glass is bonded to the adjacent PBSs to avoid reflections. Skew ray compensating.
[0052]
OUTPUT PBS Property Typical Range<
/td> Units Comments Glass index 1.65 1.5-2.0 — (SF2) Size 27 × 27 × 34 N/A mm Blue Tp 430-500 nm D/C D/C % Green Tp 500-600 nm 90 85-97 % Red Tp 600-680 nm 90 85-98 % Blue Ts 0.1% 0-0.2 % <
td>Yellow Ts D/C 500-680 nm
[0053]
BLUE TRIM TRANSMITTING DICHROIC Property Typical R
ange Units Comments Blue 97 96-99
% transmission <
td/> 430-480 nm Yellow 0.5 0-1
% transmission <
td>510-680 nm 50% 485 480-490 nm transmission
[0054]
BLUE PBS Property Typical Range<
/td> Units Comments Glass index 1.85 1.5-2.0 — A low coefficient (e.g., PBH56) of optical elasticity reduces stress induced birefringence. Size 22 × 22 × 28 N/A mm Blue Tp 95 >93 % 430-
520 nm Yellow Tp D/C 520-680 nm Blue Ts 0.3 <0.5 % Yellow Ts D/C 520-680 nm External Input and panels ports may be antireflective coated surfaces for <0.5% reflection over the visible spectrum.
[0055]
OUTPUT BLUE POLARIZATION ROTATING FILTER Property Typical R
ange Units Comments Blue parallel 1 <2 % polarizer - transmission 4
30-470 nm (Bp) Blue crossed- 97 >95 % polarizer transmission (Bx) Yp (540-680) 97 95-100 % Yx 2 0-4 % <
td/>
[0056] Although the exemplary embodiments described herein may be described in reference to specific colors or combinations of colors, it should be understood that other color combinations are also possible. For example, the color filters can be any combination of colors including Red/Blue, Blue/Green, Red/Green, an additive primary and its complementary subtractive primary or any other color pair as system criteria dictate.
[0057] As used herein, rotation is not limited to a pure optical rotation but also includes any transformation that results in optical transformation or other effects that result in apparent optical rotation. For example, a half-wave plate at 45° can transform a linear state into an orthogonal linear state via retardation but not through rotation.
[0058] Although several embodiments and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that changes, substitutions, transformations, modifications, variations, permutations and alterations may be made therein without departing from the teachings of the present application, the spirit and the scope of the invention being set forth by the appended claims. Further, the reference in this application to “Invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is a single point of novelty claimed in this application. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims associated with this patent specification, and the claims accordingly define the invention(s) that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of the claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of the specification but should not be constrained by the reference to “Invention” included in this application.
[0059] Realizations in accordance with the present invention have been described in the context of particular embodiments. These embodiments are meant to be illustrative and not limiting. Many variations, modifications, additions, and improvements are possible. Accordingly, plural instances may be provided for components described herein as a single instance. Boundaries between various components, operations and data stores are somewhat arbitrary, and particular operations are illustrated in the context of specific illustrative configurations. Other allocations of functionality are envisioned and may fall within the scope of claims that follow. Finally, structures and functionality presented as discrete components in the exemplary configurations may be implemented as a combined structure or component. These and other variations, modifications, additions, and improvements may fall within the scope of the invention as defined in the claims that follow.
[0060] The section headings in this application are provided for consistency with the parts of an application suggested under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any patent claims that may issue from this application. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Field of the Invention,” the claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called field of the invention. Further, a description of a technology in the “Description of Related Art” is not be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to the present application. Neither is the “Summary of the Invention” to be considered as a characterization of the invention(s) set forth in the claims to this application. Further, the reference in these headings to “Invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is a single point of novelty claimed in this application. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims associated with this patent specification, and the claims accordingly define the invention(s) that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of the claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of the specification but should not be constrained by the headings included in this application.