Plaque It!
Sponsored by: Flash of Genius |
[0001] This is a Continuation Application of PCT Application No. PCT/JP02/08121, filed Aug. 8, 2002, which was not published under PCT Article 21(2) in English.
[0002] This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-242596, filed Aug. 9, 2001, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
[0003] 1. Field of the Invention
[0004] The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for removing mercury from a waste gas, particularly, to a method and apparatus for effectively removing metal mercury from a waste gas in a system of desulfurizing a large amount of a waste gas.
[0005] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0006] As known to the art, traces of harmful substances such as mercury are contained in the waste gas generated from the combustion of coal or a heavy hydrocarbon oil, and it is difficult in general to remove these traces of harmful substances by the flue gas processing system available nowadays. Mercury is considered to be present in the waste gas in the form of metal mercury or mercury chloride (HgCl
[0007] In respect of the activated char coal adsorption method, a method of, for example, blowing an activated char coal powder into a waste gas for recovering metal mercury in a bag filter has already been put to a practical use. However, this method is used mainly for processing a waste gas generated from a rubbish incineration and, thus, is costly and not adapted for use for processing a large volume of a waste gas generated from, for example, a power station.
[0008] When it comes to the sodium hypochlorite absorption method, known is a method that an additive such as sodium hypochlorite is added directly to, for example, a cooling water for a cooling tower or an absorption solution for an absorption tower included in a desulfurization plant, or to the water supplied to or circulated in a wet electric dust collecting machine. However, in any of these cases, the additive is added to the main equipment of the waste gas processing plant, with the result that it is possible for the essential function of the main equipment to be impaired depending on the kind of the additive.
[0009] For example, in the case of using the additive in a cooling tower, the additive is consumed for the absorption of SO
[0010] On the other hand, the metal mercury is unlikely to be dissolved in water and, thus, is likely to pass through a desulfurization apparatus. However, it is possible to remove the metal mercury in a desulfurization apparatus if it is possible to make the metal mercury soluble in water. Such being the situation, it is conceivable to use a denitrification apparatus loaded with a catalyst. In this case, the metal mercury is converted on the catalyst into mercury chloride that is easy to be dissolved in water so as to remove mercury in a desulfurization apparatus on the downstream side. In other words, it is considered effective to use a flue gas processing method in which a chlorinating agent such as hydrogen chloride, which serves to convert the metal mercury into mercury chloride, is injected the upstream stage of the denitrification apparatus.
[0011] It has been found that the metal mercury is oxidized into mercury chloride on the catalyst in the presence of HCl by reaction (1) given below:
[0012] In the reaction system including the metal mercury, the HCl concentration in equilibrium is high as shown in
[0013] However, since the denitrification catalyst is arranged upstream of the air heater (AH) and the temperature under which the denitrification catalyst is used is limited to 300° C. to 450° C., it was necessary to add an excessively large amount of the chlorinating agent such as HCl to the fuel having a low Cl content so as to allow mercury chloride to be rendered stable. However, if added in an excessively large amount, the chlorinating agent causes corrosion of the flue and the downstream apparatus included in the system so as to give rise to the problem that the life of the plant facility is shortened. Also, an additional problem is generated that the utility cost is increased depending on the injection amount of the chlorinating agent.
[0014] To be more specific, an air heater, a dust collector, a gas heater (heat exchanger) and a desulfurizing absorption tower are arranged in the order mentioned on the downstream side of the denitrification apparatus. Particularly, the corrosion and breakage of the apparatus are greatly affected by the chlorinating agent in the heat exchanger in which the cooling is performed. Also, since the chlorinating agent also enters the desulfurizing absorption tower, the chlorine concentration in the absorbing solution is increased so as to give rise to a problem in respect of the corrosion and breakage in the metal portion within the desulfurizing absorption tower. Further, if the chlorine concentration in the desulfurizing absorption tower is increased, a new problem is generated that the oxidizing performance in the desulfurizing step is lowered or the desulfurizing performance itself is lowered. In this case, it is possible for the performance of the entire system to be lowered. Further, with increase in the chlorine concentration, the foaming capability of the absorbing solution is increased. In this case, it is possible for the pressure loss within the absorption tower to be increased so as to increase the power for operating the desulfurizing absorption tower.
[0015] A first object of the present invention is to provide a method of removing mercury from a waste gas, in which the metal mercury is oxidized into mercury chloride by a solid catalyst under a reaction temperature not higher than 300° C., followed by removing mercury by using an alkaline absorbing solution, thereby making it possible to oxidize stably the metal mercury into mercury chloride without adding a chlorinating agent such as HCl even in the case of using a fuel low in the Cl content.
[0016] A second object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus for removing mercury from a waste gas, which permits stably oxidizing the metal mercury into mercury chloride, comprising a catalytic oxidizing apparatus for oxidizing the metal mercury contained in a combustion waste gas containing SO
[0017] According to a first aspect of the present invention, which is intended to achieve the objects described above, there is provided a method of removing mercury from a combustion waste gas containing SO
[0018] Further, according to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for removing mercury from a waste gas, comprising a catalytic oxidizing apparatus in which the metal mercury in a combustion waste gas containing SO
[0019] In the present invention, it is desirable for the reaction temperature in carrying out the reaction between a combustion waste gas and the solid catalyst to fall within a range of between 60° C. and 200° C. If the reaction is carried out within the temperature range given above, mercury chloride formed is rendered stable.
[0020] In the present invention, the metal mercury is oxidized into mercury chloride under the reaction temperature not higher than 300° C. It should be noted in this connection that mercury chloride is rendered stable under temperatures not higher than 300° C. regardless of the properties of the fuel even in the case where the Cl content of the fuel is low.
[0021] In the present invention, it is desirable to measure the temperature of the combustion waste gas at the inlet port of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus and/or the concentration of the metal mercury or mercury chloride in the combustion waste gas at the outlet port of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus and to control the temperature of the combustion waste gas by using the temperature control apparatus at the inlet port of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus based on the measured value.
[0022] Further, in the present invention, it is desirable to arrange a temperature control means provided with at least one of a heating means using a heater or a steam and a cooling means using a cooler on the upstream side of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus. This is because the temperature control means serves to control the temperature of the combustion waste gas at the inlet port of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus. Also, it is desirable to arrange a heat exchanging means (heat exchanger) such as a gas-gas heater on the upstream side of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus because the heat exchanger serves to control the temperature of the combustion waste gas at the inlet port of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus.
[0023] According to the present invention of the particular construction, it is possible to oxidize the metal mercury stably into mercury chloride in the operation to remove mercury in a flue gas processing system capable of removing mercury, particularly, a metal mercury vapor, contained in a large amount of a gas such as a waste gas generated from a power station even if the fuel used has a low Cl content and even if a chlorinating agent such as HCl is not added to the reaction system. It follows that it is possible to operate the system efficiently and to maintain the performance of the system without giving detrimental effects to the downstream apparatuses.
[0024] To be more specific, since a chlorinating agent is not added to the reaction system, it is possible to prevent effectively the problem of the corrosion and breakage in respect of the apparatuses such as the heat exchanger and the desulfurizing absorption tower arranged downstream of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus. Also, the chlorine concentration in the desulfurizing absorption tower is increased so as to prevent the oxidizing performance or the desulfurizing performance from being lowered in the desulfurizing step or to prevent the foaming capability of the absorbing solution from being increased. It follows that it is possible to maintain or improve the performance of the entire system including the desulfurizing performance.
[0025] Further, according to the present invention, it is unnecessary to use a spraying facility of a chlorinating agent such as hydrogen chloride. Also, the utility cost such as the cost of the chlorinating agent is not required in the present invention. What should also be noted is that it is possible to apply the technical idea of the present invention to a waste gas source discharged at a lower temperature such as a combustion waste gas, and it is possible to operate efficiently the apparatus of the present invention and to maintain the performance of the apparatus as a stable mercury removing system by controlling the catalyst temperature.
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030] The present invention will now be described more in detail.
[0031] In the waste gas processing of the present invention for processing a waste gas containing sulfur oxides (SO
[0032]
[0033] In the present invention, a waste gas containing SO
[0034] Such being the situation, in the present invention, the metal mercury is converted into a water-soluble mercury chloride by a catalytic oxidizing apparatus arranged upstream of the desulfurizing apparatus and, then, the waste gas containing mercury chloride is guided into the desulfurizing absorption tower.
[0035] In the system shown in
[0036] The dust collector
[0037] It the wet desulfurizing system of the construction described above, the re-heater
[0038] Incidentally, each of the heat exchanger
[0039] Chlorine contained in the fuel is present in the form of HCl in the waste gas generated from the boiler
[0040] In the present invention of the particular construction described above, the metal mercury is oxidized into a water-soluble mercury compound in the presence of a solid catalyst, and the water-soluble mercury compound within the waste gas is removed in the wet desulfurizing process step. It should be noted in this connection that the optimum temperature for applying an oxidizing treatment to the metal mercury is changed depending on the Cl content in the fuel. Therefore, a problem is generated that the metal mercury is not sufficiently oxidized because the waste gas temperature is excessively higher or lower than the optimum temperature noted above so as to cause the metal mercury to be discharged into the air atmosphere.
[0041] Under the circumstances, in the embodiment of the present invention, the gas temperature within the catalytic oxidizing apparatus
[0042] Where the gas temperature within the catalytic oxidizing apparatus
[0043] As described above, the apparatus for removing mercury from a waste gas, which is shown in
[0044] The following description covers the case where the gas temperature in the catalytic oxidizing apparatus
[0045] It should be noted that the metal mercury concentration in the inlet port “a” of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus
[0046] where C
[0047] As apparent from formulas (2) and (3) given above, the appropriate temperature can be obtained from the relationship between the catalyst temperature and the oxidizing rate of the metal mercury.
[0048] Under the circumstances, in the embodiment of the present invention, the gas temperature Y in the inlet port “a” of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus
[0049] The waste gas processed in the present invention includes, for example, a waste gas generated from a thermoelectric power station utilizing combustion of a fuel containing sulfur and mercury such as coal or a heavy hydrocarbon oil, a waste gas generated from a boiler used in, for example, a factory, and a waste gas generated from a heating furnace included in a metal factory, a petroleum refinery, a petrochemical plant, etc. What should be noted is that the a large amount of a waste gas containing carbon dioxide, oxygen, SO
[0050] The conventional wet desulfurizing apparatus can be used in the present invention. The absorbing solution used for the wet desulfurization includes an aqueous solution (alkaline absorbing solution) of absorbents such as calcium carbonate, calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide, sodium carbonate and caustic soda.
[0051] The solid catalyst used in the present invention includes a catalyst prepared by allowing at least one active species selected from the group consisting of Pt, Ru, Rh, Rd, Ir, V, W, Mo, Ni, Co, Fe, Cr, Cu and Mn to be supported by at least one carrier selected from the group consisting of TiO
[0052] It is particularly desirable to use titanium as a carrier. It should be noted that a catalyst prepared by allowing at least one kind of an oxide selected from the group consisting of an oxide of vanadium, tungsten or molybdenum to be supported as an active metal species in a carrier formed of a composite oxide of titanium exhibits a satisfactory activity.
[0053] In the present invention, it is desirable to use a titanium oxide in the form of a composite oxide in order to increase the specific surface area and the amount of the solid acid of the decomposing catalyst. The metal forming the composite oxide together with titanium includes, for example, silicon (Si), zirconium (Zr), aluminum (Al) and tungsten (W). To be more specific, it is possible to use a composite oxide containing titanium and silicon, a composite oxide containing titanium and zirconium, a composite oxide containing titanium and aluminum, and a composite oxide containing titanium and tungsten. Any of these composite oxides is unlikely to form a sulfate and, thus, permits maintaining a stable structure so as to make it possible to increase the specific surface area and the amount of the solid acid.
[0054] It is also possible to use a ternary composite oxide such as a composite oxide containing silicon and zirconium together with titanium, a composite oxide containing silicon and tungsten together with titanium, a composite oxide containing silicon and aluminum together with titanium, a composite oxide containing zirconium and aluminum together with titanium, and a composite oxide containing zirconium and tungsten together with titanium.
[0055] The composition of the carrier in the case of a composite oxide is not particularly limited. However, it is desirable for the carrier to contain, for example, 70 to 95 parts by weight of titanium and 30 to 5 parts by weight of an oxide of silicon (Si), zirconium (Zr), aluminum (Al) and/or tungsten (W). If the amount of the oxide falls within the range noted above, the catalyst contains the largest amount of the solid acid so as to exhibit a high catalytic activity. If the amount of the oxide fails to fall within the range noted above, it is impossible to obtain a sufficiently large amount of the solid catalyst.
[0056] Any metal salt such as a chloride, a sulfate and a nitrate can be used as the raw material for providing the elements forming the composite oxide. To be more specific, the metal salt in the form of an aqueous solution is dripped into an alkali aqueous solution such as an aqueous solution of ammonia or sodium carbonate so as to achieve co-precipitation. It is also possible to use each metal alkoxide raw material so as to obtain a complex hydroxide by means of, for example, hydrolysis. The complex hydroxide cake formed by the co-precipitation or hydrolysis is washed and, then, dried, followed by baking the dried cake under temperatures falling within a range of between 200° C. and 650° C. so as to obtain a desired composite oxide. It should be noted that, if the baking temperature is lower than 200° C., it is impossible to retain the metal salt in the form of an oxide. On the other hand, if the baking temperature exceeds 650° C., the particles are fused to each other so as to decrease the surface area of the catalyst.
[0057] In the catalyst used in the present invention, at least one element selected from the group consisting of Pt, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ir, V, W, Mo, Ni, Co, Fe, Cr, Cu and Mn is supported on the composite oxide used as a carrier. Any of the oxides exemplified above exhibits an oxidizing power so as to make it possible to oxidize th metal mercury into mercury chloride. Also, any of the oxides referred to above is excellent in durability relative to a sulfur compound and a heavy metal.
[0058] The components and the mixing ratio of the components of the catalyst composition are not particularly limited in the present invention. However, in a typical example, it is desirable for the catalyst to comprise 1 to 20 parts by weight of the catalytic component in the case of a one component system such as vanadium pentoxide relative to 100 parts by weight of the carrier consisting of a single kind of an oxide or a composite oxide. Likewise, in the case of a binary system, it is desirable to use a catalyst containing 1 to 10 parts by weight of vanadium pentoxide and 2 to 25 parts by weight of tungsten trioxide or a catalyst containing 1 to 10 parts by weight of vanadium pentoxide and 2 to 25 parts by weight of molybdenum trioxide. Likewise, in the case of a ternary system, it is desirable to use a catalyst containing 1 to 10 parts by weight of vanadium pentoxide, 1 to 20 parts by weight of tungsten trioxide and 1 to 20 parts by weight of molybdenum trioxide.
[0059] The catalytic activity of the catalyst is increased with increase in the amount of the active metal supported by the carrier. However, if the active metal is excessively supported by the carrier, it is possible to promote a side reaction such as the reaction to convert SO
[0060] Also, in the present invention, it is possible to use a solid catalyst prepared by allowing at least one kind of a VIII group metal selected from the group consisting of nickel, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium and platinum and a sulfate group or a precursor material of the sulfate group to be supported by a carrier consisting of a hydroxide or an oxide of at least one IV group metal selected from the group consisting of silicon, titanium and zirconium and/or a hydroxide or an oxide of aluminum, followed by baking the resultant structure so as to stabilize the resultant structure.
[0061] It is possible for the catalyst used in the catalytic oxidizing apparatus to be integrally molded and to assume an optional shape. For example, it is possible for the catalyst noted above to have a shape of a pellet, a plate or a cylinder. It is also possible for the catalyst to be corrugated or to have a honeycomb structure. Incidentally, it is naturally desirable for the catalyst to have a large contact area with the gas. However, it is undesirable for the catalyst to have an excessively large contact area with the gas because the fluidizing back pressure of the waste gas is increased depending on the degree of the loading density of a powdery catalyst. As a measure against the difficulty, it is desirable in general to use a molded catalyst of, for example, a honeycomb structure obtained by compressing a powdery catalyst to have a prescribed density without excessively decreasing the specific surface area of the catalyst.
[0062] In order to confirm the effect of removing mercury produced by the present invention, experiments were conducted as follows. Needless to say, the present invention is not limited at all by the description of the examples described below.
[0063] Methods of preparing honeycomb catalysts 1 to 5 will now be described.
[0064] [Preparation of Honeycomb Catalysts 1 and 2]
[0065] In the first step, an aqueous solution of titanyl sulfate (TiSO
[0066] In the next step, ammonium metavanadate was dissolved in an aqueous solution of methyl amine such that 5 parts by weight of V
[0067] On the other hand, ammonium paratungstate and ammonium metavanadate were dissolved in an aqueous solution of methyl amine such that 8 parts by weight of WO
[0068] Further, an ammonia water was added to a mixture including 3 parts by weight of a glass fiber used as a binder, 3 parts by weight of kaolin and 3 parts by weight of cellulose acetate used as an organic plasticizer, followed by kneading the mixture. The kneaded mixture was subjected to an extrusion molding so as to obtain an integral molding of a honeycomb structure having a pitch of 5.0 mm (wall thickness of 1.0 mm). The molding thus obtained was dried and, then, baked at 500° C. for 5 hours so as to remove the organic plasticizer, thereby obtaining honeycomb catalysts 1 and 2.
[0069] [Preparation of Honeycomb Catalyst 3]
[0070] A composite oxide 2 was obtained by a method similar to that employed for obtaining the composite oxide 1, except that zirconium oxynitride was added in place of the colloidal silica at a mixing ratio TiO
[0071] [Preparation of Honeycomb Catalyst 4]
[0072] A zirconium hydroxide (Zr(OH)
[0073] [Preparation of Honeycomb Catalyst 5]
[0074] A titanium oxide (TiO
[0075] Some Examples of the present invention will now be described.
[0076] A test for evaluating the oxidizing rate of mercury and the mercury removal rate in an absorbing bottle was conducted in respect of each of three kinds of catalysts by using an apparatus for removing mercury from a waste gas shown in
[0077] The pseudo gas
[0078] The test was conducted under a gas amount of 90 l (liters) N/h(w), a catalyst SV of 3000 h
TABLE 1 Gas amount 90 IN/h H 7% CO 12% O 5% N Balance HCl 1 ppm Hg 20 μg/m P Normal pressure Temperature 120° C. SV 3000 h Catalyst {circle over (1)} V {circle over (2)} V {circle over (3)} V Liquid composition 20 wt % CaSO Absorbing solution 50° C. temperature
[0079] During the test, an inlet gas “a” and an outlet gas “b” of the catalyst were sampled so as to measure the mercury concentration. The mercury chloride concentration was measured in the outlet gas “b” so as to obtain the mercury oxidizing rate with the catalyst by formula (4) given below:
[0080] where L represents the mercury oxidizing rate (%), M represents the HgCl
[0081] A gas c at the outlet port of the absorbing bottle was also sampled so as to measure the mercury removal rate in the absorbing bottle by formula (5) given below:
[0082] where U represents the mercury removal rate (%), V represents the Hg concentration at the catalyst inlet port, and M represents the Hg concentration at the outlet port of the absorbing bottle.
[0083] The mercury oxidizing rates of the honeycomb catalysts 1, 2 and 3 were found to be 90%, 94% and 92%, respectively, supporting that each of these honeycomb catalysts exhibits a high mercury oxidizing rate. Also, the mercury removal rates in the absorbing bottle
[0084] A test for evaluating the oxidizing rate of mercury and the mercury removal rate in an absorbing bottle was conducted as in Example 1 in respect of two additional catalysts (honeycomb catalysts 4 and 5) by using the apparatus shown in
TABLE 2 Gas amount 90 IN/h H 8% CO 14% O 4% N Balance HCl 2 ppm Hg 20 μg/m P Normal pressure Temperature 90° C. SV 1500 h Catalyst {circle over (4)} NiSO {circle over (5)} Pt/TiO Liquid composition 20 wt % CaSO Absorbing solution 50° C. temperature
[0085] The mercury removal rates in the cases of using the honeycomb catalysts 4 and 5 were found to be 88% and 85%, respectively, supporting a high mercury oxidizing performance achieved in the cases of using each of these honeycomb catalysts 4 and 5. On the other hand, the mercury removal rates in the absorbing bottle in the cases of using the honeycomb catalysts 4 and 5 were found to be 90% and 88%, respectively, supporting a sufficiently high mercury removing performance.
[0086] A test for evaluating the oxidizing rate of mercury and the mercury removal rate in a desulfurizing absorption tower was conducted by using an apparatus for removing mercury from a waste gas shown in
TABLE 3 Gas amount 200 m H 8% CO 14% O 4% N Balance SO 500 ppm HCl 5 ppm Hg 10 μg/m P Normal pressure Temperature 120° C. SV 3000 h Catalyst {circle over (1)} V {circle over (2)} V {circle over (3)} V Liquid 0.5 M (NH composition
[0087] The gist portions of the apparatus shown in
[0088] A reference numeral
[0089] An air stream A and the finely pulverized coal B were continuously supplied into the combustion furnace
[0090] During the operation described above, the mercury concentration was measured at the inlet port “a” and the outlet port “b” of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus
[0091] The mercury oxidizing rates achieved by the honeycomb catalysts 1, 2 and 3 were found to be 92%, 95% and 94%, respectively, supporting a high mercury oxidizing performance of each of these honeycomb catalysts. Also, the mercury removal rates in the absorbing bottle were found to be high, i.e., 94%, 96% and 95% in the cases of using the honeycomb catalysts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In conclusion, it has been clarified that the present invention also provides an effective mercury removing system in the processing of a combustion waste gas.
[0092] The stability of the mercury oxidizing performance was evaluated by using the mercury removing apparatus shown in
[0093] Also, the gas temperature in the inlet port of the catalytic oxidizing apparatus
[0094] As described above, it has been clarified that a stable mercury oxidizing performance can be maintained by controlling the catalyst temperature.