Next Patent: Automatic dispensing system
Next Patent: Automatic dispensing system
[0001] This application relates and claims priority for all purposes to pending U.S. application ser. No. 60/351,524, filed Jan. 24, 2002, and is a continuation in part to pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/837,507 filed Apr. 18, 2001, and Ser. No. 09/861,298 filed May 18, 2001.
[0002] This invention relates to apparatus and processes for cleaning residual matter, photoresist and other foreign materials off wafers, substrates and other work pieces including photomasks, compact discs, flat panel displays, and in particular, to cleaning semiconductor wafers, using acoustic wave techniques including megasonics in conjunction with supercritical fluid soaking, rapid decompression, flushing, and related process mechanisms to enhance the cleaning capability and remove submicron particles.
[0003] Among the art related to ultrasonics and supercritical fluids, there is: U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,446 “Apparatus for applying ultrasonic energy in precision cleaning”, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,366 “Cleaning process using phase shifting of dense phase gases”.
[0004] With respect to the need to remove submicron particles from semiconductor surfaces, ultrasonic acoustical techniques in unpressurized liquid baths have been used. Ultrasonics causes damage to the microstructures on the semiconductor surface due to cavitation. Calculations done by Spall et al. for turbulent flow of supercritical phase carbon dioxide to remove particles from a semiconductor wafer indicate that extremely high velocities are required, ˜200 cm/s for particles 0.1 micron in diameter. High velocities are needed apparently due to the formation of a boundary layer near the surface. Within this boundary layer, there is a shear in the velocity field leading to a stress which rolls particles away from any given position. The wall shear in case of turbulent flow is much greater than in laminar flow. In laminar flow, the boundary layer is relatively thicker, allowing the velocity to change gradually to its stream value. In case of turbulent flow, the viscous sublayer which develops right next to the wall is much thinner, causing a more abrupt change in the velocity field, thereby setting up a larger wall shear.
[0005] Adhesion forces between a particle and a surface vary linearly with the particle diameter. Removal forces vary as the second power of the particle size. Therefore particle removal becomes more difficult as the particle size decreases. The lift force depends inversely on fluid viscosity, favoring supercritical fluid processes. For the drag force a higher viscosity is preferred, which is not favorable for supercritical fluid processes. However the boundary layer thickness would be much thinner.
[0006] The description and table below indicate that there are many forces that keep particles on surfaces and make cleaning difficult.
TABLE 1 Effect on the various adhesion forces between a SiO contacting a flat, horizontal Si surface immersed in (a) liquid CO and (b) supercritical CO empirical relationships for these forces. All forces are given in dynes. SiO SiO SiO F 8.76 × 10 7.01 × 10 3.09 × 10 Note: d = particle diameter F 8.69 × 10 8.69 × 10 8.69 × 10 F 8.02 d 8.02 d (laminar flow) 8.02 d F ρ similar ρ similar (turbulent flow) similar F similar F 0.16 ρ V F lower η → lower η → (laminar flow) ρ similar ρ similar 1.615 η higher F higher F lower η → lower η → (turbulent flow) ρ similar ρ similar 0.076 η higher F higher F similar F similar F 1.34 × 10
[0007] Definition of terms in above table:
[0008] FvdW=Van der Waals forces have 3 components—interactions between permanent dipoles (van der Waals-Keesom force), interaction between permanent dipoles and induced dipoles (van der Waals-Debye force) and interactions between induced dipoles (van der Waals-London force).
[0009] Fdbl=electric double layer force—dominates for small particles (<5 microns). A surface contact potential is created between two different materials based upon each material's respective local energy state. Resulting surface charge buildup needed to preserve charge neutrality sets up a double layer charge region which creates the electrostatic attraction.
[0010] F drag=drag force—function of the fluid velocity
[0011] F lift=lift force—the lower flow at the bottom of the particle relative to the velocity of flow at the top of the particle results in a lifting force, tending to apply a force in the normal direction to the surface. The magnitude of the lift force will depend on the nature of the near-surface flow.
[0012] F grav=gravitational force
[0013] Based on above analysis of adhesion forces for immersion in liquid carbon dioxide and supercritical carbon dioxide versus water, it can be deduced that additional removal forces must be generated to achieve comparable particle removal forces.
[0014] In prior art, supercritical fluids processes for cleaning have dealt with removing films, e.g. photoresist, or large particulates, e.g. etch residues, and not submicron particles.
[0015] Both terms “ultrasonics” and “megasonics” refer here to the generation and transmitting of acoustical wave patterns into a medium as a means of providing or enhancing a cleaning process. Transducer arrays used for this purpose are well known in the art. The difference between ultrasonics and megasonics in this context is the frequency at which the acoustic wave pattern is generated. Ultrasonics is understood in the industry to span frequencies of 20-350 KHz, and is associated in cleaning applications with producing random cavitation. Megasonics refers to a higher frequency band, 700-1000 KHz, and is associated for cleaning purposes with offering minimal, controlled cavitation and frontal cleaning action. The ultrasonic induced cavitation during cleaning of semiconductor wafers has caused erosion and surface damage problems. This became more evident as semiconductor device features became smaller, in the submicron range. With megasonics, only the side of the part that is exposed to or facing the transducer is affected. Using megasonics in aqueous fluids, it is speculated that particle removal is accomplished through a high-pressure wave mechanism rather than by cavitation. The effects of megasonics in supercritical fluids have been heretofore unknown.
[0016] Improvement in the supercritical fluid cleaning process for cleaning semiconductor wafer surfaces and other articles is needed. The integration of megasonics into this supercritical fluid process is introduced in the description that follows.
[0017] Using a suitable apparatus with a pressurized process chamber, as is further described below, the principle steps of the process of the invention for removing the identified type of residue are as follows:
[0018] 1. Place the substrate, wafer, or other article of interest in an environment of supercritical fluid, preferably carbon dioxide, mixed with co-solvents and/or surfactants suitable for the material to be removed, at a higher pressure within a working supercritical pressure range. This requires a suitable heated, pressure vessel and supporting systems as is well understood by those skilled in the art. The higher pressure within the supercritical range is necessary to accomplish the decompression step described below. The pressure may be raised slowly or by any inflow, pump, or pulsation method within the capability of the apparatus.
[0019] 2. Soak the wafer in the supercritical fluid mixture under the higher supercritical pressure for a period of time, allowing the mixture and the pressure to permeate the material to be removed. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reviewing this disclosure, the period for soaking depends on variables such as what materials or residues, how much residue, how many repetitions or cycles of this process are expected to be conducted on the wafer, what cleaning materials, and what end result is sought. Part of the intent is to have the supercritical fluid mixture permeate the residue and perform its softening and weakening effect. Part of the intent of the soak is that the high pressure permeate the surface of the residue to a depth that upon rapid decompression of the chamber will provoke a physical rendering of at least a surface layer of the weakened residue, as has been described in related application PCT/US01/15999, published on or about Nov. 18, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference.
[0020] 3. Apply one or more very rapid decompression pulses between the higher and a lower supercritical pressure to the wafer to break up and loosen the residue. Generally speaking, the wider the pressure differential and faster it is applied, the more effective its rendering action.
[0021] 4. Flush the wafer with clean supercritical phase carbon dioxide to remove the loose residue debris from the wafer surface and carry it out of the cleaning chamber, thereby restoring the chamber fluid to a clean state. The flush step may incorporate or be followed by an increase in pressure, gradual or pulsed, to the higher supercritical pressure, and above steps repeated, if continued or additional cleaning action is desired.
[0022] 5. Apply megasonics action with a large surface area transducer array to the mixture and hence to the surface of the wafer as described herein, at one or more of: (a) during the soak to promote deeper penetration of the mixture and pressure into the residue surface, (b) during the decompression pulse to enhance the rendering of the surface layer of residue, (c) immediately after the decompression pulse to extend and continue the physical stress on the weakened residue, and (d) during the flush to aid in removing and carrying the loose debris off the surface of the wafer for removal with the outgoing fluid flow. The megasonics transducer array is preferably operated continually during the cleaning cycle, and may be operated or modulated intermittently or intersegmentally in any of phase, power level, frequency, and on-off switching modes, with selected or varied proximity to the surface of the substrate, all as may optimize the additional effects of the megasonics action on the cleaning process.
[0023] As is apparent from the above, an important aspect of this invention is the combination of the cycle of high pressure soak, rapid decompression, and flush, and the megasonics action. In the prior art of megasonics there is mention of pulsing but it has to do with pulsing the input power to the transducer, nothing to do with a change in total pressure. The combination of the process mechanisms described here has a dramatic further effect for cleaning and removing particles in the submicron range.
[0024] One prior art specimen on megasonics, U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,626, discloses control of the gas content in the cleaning process liquid for improved megasonic cleaning of semiconductor wafers. It indicates that the effectiveness of particle removal from wafers using megasonics action and dilute chemistry was found to be dependent on the total gas content in the deionized water. This activity was conducted in unpressurized systems without reference to the significance of total system pressure or megasonic action in a supercritical fluid.
[0025] Recent prior art U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,286,231 and 6,357,142 discuss the use of “sonics” with pressurized fluids to enhance cleaning performance. The descriptions provided teach the use of megasonics or “sonics” when the fluid is in the liquid phase, but are unhelpful with respect to the utilization of megasonics in supercritical fluids.
[0026] With the apparatus of the present invention, there is included the capability to alter the chamber environment between the liquid, gas and supercritical states, to apply megasonic action to the wafer in the supercritical fluid phase, and to control the formation of bubbles and pressure wave propagation in the supercritical fluid mixture to greatest advantage for improved cleaning of submicron particles.
[0027] This disclosure describes the process and apparatus for precision cleaning of surfaces, including removal of photoresist and etch residue from semiconductor wafers, post CMP (chemical mechanical polishing) cleaning, photomask cleaning, bare Silicon wafer cleaning, flat panel displays cleaning, ceramic substrate cleaning, and hard disk drives cleaning, etc.
[0028] It is therefore an objective of the invention to provide an apparatus and process for cleaning residual matter, photoresist and other foreign materials off wafers, substrates and other work pieces including photomasks, compact discs, flat panel displays.
[0029] It is in particular an objective to provide for cleaning semiconductor wafers, using acoustic wave techniques including megasonics in conjunction with supercritical fluid soaking, rapid decompression, flushing, and related process mechanisms to enhance the cleaning capability and remove submicron particles.
[0030] Other and various objectives and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the figures and description of preferred embodiments that follows.
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040] The Applicant has amply described its cleaning process using supercritical fluid, particularly carbon dioxide, in its parent applications, which are hereby incorporated by reference. The instant invention is susceptible of many embodiments. Below is a general description of the steps of a preferred embodiment of the invention, and a description of the relevant aspects of the apparatus.
[0041] The wafer or substrate is immersed in a mixture of supercritical fluid and appropriate co-solvent. The choice of co-solvent will depend upon the materials to be cleaned from the surfaced of the substrate. A suitable surfactant can also be added. A high pressure soaking period will allow the supercritical carbon dioxide and co-solvent to penetrate the materials to be removed. Swelling of these materials will occur along with a debonding of them from the surface of the substrate. The high pressure will permeate the material as well, setting the stage for the rapid decompression pulse. At this point the megasonic transducers will be activated and the controlled rapid depressurization of the system to a lower supercritical phase pressure.
[0042] During the depressurization or decompression pulse there is a rapid expansion of carbon dioxide within the photoresist polymer matrix. At the same time, the continuous pattern of shock waves and acoustic streaming pattern generated by the large surface area megasonics transducer array enhances the breakup and delaminating of the photoresist from the substrate. The acoustic streaming also transfers momentum to fine particles and facilitates their transport off the substrate surface. Coupled with the acoustic streaming action is the rapid outflow of fluid over the substrate surface, applying further removing force to the loose particles.
[0043] The combination of the megasonics and the rapid decompression and fluid outflow mechanisms applied in a medium of supercritical carbon dioxide and co solvent provides a significant advantage over other cleaning methods for separating the unwanted films from the surface of the substrate along with submicron particles. After the decompression step, clean supercritical phase carbon dioxide is then flowed over the surface and the chamber flushed to carry away the unwanted debris. After completion of the cleaning cycle, the megasonics transducer array is deactivated and the process vessel is returned to atmospheric pressure and the substrate unloaded.
[0044] To highlight the key aspects of the process, we are in effect applying five mechanisms jointly to overcome the five forces described in our background section, in order to breakup, loosen and remove the submicron particles without undue damage to the microstructures present on the wafer.
[0045] 1. Supercritical carbon dioxide is itself an excellent solvent for non-polar materials.
[0046] 2. The use of a suitable co-solvent or mixture of co-solvents to aid in the solubility of the organic materials by diffusing into the polymer matrix with the carbon dioxide.
[0047] 3. A high pressure soak to swell and weaken the polymer materials at high pressure, followed by a rapid depressurization to debond and delaminate the swollen and weakened polymer from the surface.
[0048] 4. Megasonics action in the supercritical fluid medium to provide turbulence and energy to enhance the soaking and swelling process; the rendering process during decompression and flushing; and the moving of the loose and broken polymer particles off of the surface of the substrate.
[0049] 5. Surfactants to change the zeta potential of the substrate/particle in order to aid in removing very small particles from the surface.
[0050] Unique aspects of the apparatus include the incorporation of the megasonics transducers or multi-segment transducer arrays of significant surface area within the pressure vessel for enhancing the other removal forces or mechanisms; optional rotation or alternate orientation of the wafer or substrate with respect to the transducers for a more distributed megasonics effect on the wafer surface, and through-chamber flow control of the supercritical carbon dioxide for using flow velocity to reinforce the other removal forces. Using megasonics action in combination with supercritical fluid cleaning techniques including high pressure soak and very rapid decompressive pulse cycles allows for faster process times and removal of smaller particles from surfaces with less damage to microstructures.
[0051] A preferred embodiment of the invention utilizes the principle steps:
[0052] 1. Fill the process chamber holding the substrate or wafer, with supercritical phase carbon dioxide and pressurize to a higher pressure within the supercritical phase working range of the process chamber.
[0053] 2. Add co-solvents and/or surfactants to the chamber, suitable for attacking the residue to be removed.
[0054] 3. Soak the wafer in the SCCO2 mixture at the high pressure for a period of time, allowing the fluid mixture and pressure to permeate the residue
[0055] 4. Initiate megasonics action within the chamber with a large surface area transducer or segmented array, in proximity to the surface to be cleaned.
[0056] 5. Apply a very rapid decompression pulse to the chamber to break up and loosen the residue, continuing the megasonics action through the decompression pulse and associated outflow of supercritical mixture and loose residue to a new equilibrium point at a lower supercritical pressure.
[0057] 6. Flush the chamber with clean supercritical fluid, continuing the megasonics action, to further loosen and remove remaining residue.
[0058] 7. Raise the chamber pressure again and repeat steps 4-6 as often as needed.
[0059] 8. Terminate the megasonics action and fluid flow, depressurize the chamber to atmosphere and remove the wafer.
[0060] Variations on these steps and/or additional process steps, including positive pressure pulsing, liquid phase processing, temperature variations, density variations, wafer spinning, fixed or moving fluid spray bars and nozzles and mechanical agitation are within the scope of the invention, as are configurations providing for multiple wafer batch processing and alternate orientation processing.
[0061] Process conditions for cleaning 200-300 mm wafers include the following preferences:
[0062] 1. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the preferred process gas for reasons well understood in the industry, although the invention is inclusive of other suitable fluids.
[0063] 2. Co-solvents are chosen based on the selection of process gas and the chemistry of the material(s) to be removed/cleaned.
[0064] 3. Surfactants are selected on the basis of the prior selections.
[0065] 4. Initial chamber pressure is at least 5000 psi; temperature is 80 C degree.
[0066] 5. A sufficient soak period is required, generally the longer the better up to the limits of an acceptable total cycle time. A two minute soak is used in the preferred embodiment.
[0067] 6. Apparatus capability for conducting very rapid depressurization to 1500 psi, to be followed by repressurization to at least 5000 psi; the large differential being significant in the effect of the decompressive pulse.
[0068] 7. Megasonics transducer array power inputs in the order of 5-10 Watts/cm2, with transducers capable of megasonic action in a supercritical CO2 medium at the working pressures and temperatures.
[0069] 8. System capacity for flushing the chamber with clean supercritical CO2.
[0070] 9. Depressurization of the chamber to atmosphere for removal of the wafer(s).
[0071] A useful alternative is to conduct the depressurization pulse step so as to bring the chamber to a condition of higher density of the supercritical mixture, at relatively lower temperature, where megasonics transducer action is more pronounced due to the higher density and acoustic streaming velocity For example:
[0072] 1. Pressurize to at least 5000 psi in CO2 at 40 degrees C.
[0073] 2. Add co-solvent and soak.
[0074] 3. Pulse (very rapidly depressurize) to 2200 psi.
[0075] 4. Flow clean supercritical CO2 through the chamber and concurrently apply megasonics agitation.
[0076] 5. Depressurize to atmosphere.
[0077] The actual process will depend upon the material(s) being removed. The first preferred embodiment described is representative for photoresist removal. The alternative described above is more representative for residue removal. A third alternative described below would be used for submicron particle removal.
[0078] 1. Pressurize to at least 5000 psi in CO2 at 40C.
[0079] 2. Add surfactant and soak.
[0080] 3. Apply megasonics agitation.
[0081] 4. Pulse (very rapidly depressurize) to 2200 psi while maintaining megasonics agitation.
[0082] 5. Flow clean supercritical CO2 through the chamber while maintaining megasonics agitation.
[0083] 6. Terminate megasonics agitation and depressurize to atmosphere.
[0084] There are three considerations in establishing the maximum limit of pressure, as well as rate and range of pressure changes: materials and hardware design and associated regulatory limits; the type of material and structural aspects of the wafer under process; and the effect of the high pressure, and rate and range of pressure change on the cleaning process itself. As a practical matter, the first two considerations are the limiting factors. The present preferred higher pressure of about 5000 psi should be understood to be merely a practical consideration of pressure vessel regulations and contemporary pressure vessel construction common to the industry, rather than a process-based preferred pressure limit. Yet higher pressures, for example 7500 to 10,000 psi and even much higher pressures will generally provide greater effectiveness in the application of this supercritical fluid cleaning process, but higher pressures are accompanied by attendant issues of equipment design, contamination of the pressure vessel, safety, cost, impact on the wafer material and structure, and process cycle time to range the pressure from ambient to full pressurization.
[0085] Referring now to
[0086] Although the preferred embodiments provide for a fixed inverted chamber, it will be appreciated and is within the scope of the claims that lid, wafer pedestal, and chamber movement is relative; that the inverted chamber may be fixed and the lid moved vertically, or vice versa, or both be vertically movable, in order to achieve closure.
[0087] Referring particularly to
[0088] The lower heating platen
[0089] Liquid and supercritical CO2, as well as co-solvent and surfactant, are selectively available to the chamber as required from a supply/support system such as previously described by this Applicant in prior applications. Inflow of the CO2 mixture through the chamber is downward and then radial, over the wafer surface. The megasonics action is applied from just above the surface of the wafer. The very rapid decompression and flow of CO2 onto and over the wafer, coupled with the megasonics action, loosens and pushes debris and particles off the wafer surface and out of the process chamber. Separator vessels catch particles and co-solvent. The CO2 is either exhausted or recycled.
[0090] Referring to
[0091] Each megasonics array section
[0092] Referring to
[0093] In another enhancement of many embodiments, there is added to the pressure vessel or directly to the wafer pedestal the additional capability to rotate the wafer during the cleaning process, similar to the pedestal rotating mechanism
[0094] Referring to
[0095] The vessel of this embodiment is also configured with CO2 fluid supply feedthroughs for the nozzles and sealed electrical supply feedthroughs to power the transducers. As in prior embodiments, the chamber has sufficient head space below the transducers to accommodate a wafer when the underside cover is raised to a closed position, plus further spacing above the wafer sufficient for the sprayed fluid and subsequent radial flow of CO2 over the wafer through the chamber from center to edge, to the CO2 fluid return outlets. The segments of array sections
[0096] A variation of this embodiment is having each of the two checkerboard arrangements of array segments divided into the equivalent of a set of “red” segments and a set of “black” segments such that each set consists of only diagonally adjacent segments. This permits switching of power between the two sets for better heat and power management of the array. Alternatively, the two arrays
[0097] A further variation of this and other multi segment transducer array embodiments provides that megasonic transducer segments and other than megasonic transducer segments such as ultrasonic are interspersed in the array, providing a dual-frequency range sonic action capability to the pressure vessel.
[0098] Referring to
[0099] The inverted chamber in this embodiment is configured with a ceiling mounted upper heated platen
[0100] There are shown two pairs of semicircular, wall mounted, radially inward directed, sonic transducer array sections
[0101] If the process fluid supply/support system is configured for bi-directional, alternating fluid flows between inlet
[0102] The vessel is also configured with sealed electrical supply feedthroughs
[0103] Supercritical CO2, as well as co-solvent and surfactant, are selectively available to the chamber as required from a supply/support system such as previously described by this Applicant. Forward flow of the CO2 mixture through the chamber is through the side inlet
[0104] In a variation combining features of the embodiments of
[0105]
[0106] Any of the side or full disk surface area or partial surface area sonic array designs previously described can be incorporated in the inverted wafer embodiment. The large area arrays would, of course be configured on the floor of the chamber, directed upward towards the wafer surface. The supercritical soak, very rapid decompression pulse, and flush cycle previously described is fully applicable to these sonic action embodiments. Megasonics is the preferred sonic frequency range for the supercritical fluid processes, although ultrasonics with liquid phase processing is within the capability of the apparatus, as well.
[0107] Referring to
[0108] Lid section
[0109] Referring to
[0110] Lid section
[0111] Wafer support in the inverted wafer embodiments may be structurally connected to the lid or chamber sections via a perimeter based wafer support system similar to
[0112] It will be readily apparent that features of the various figures may be incorporated in other useful combinations, all within the scope of the invention. For example, the invention extends to a two sided embodiment of the invention configured for applying megasonics action and fluid flow to both sides of a wafer. Upper and lower components of the vessel may be configured with nozzles and large area sonic arrays similar to any of
[0113] These and various other embodiments of the apparatus within the scope of the invention, provide for conducting the below listed embodiments and other variants of the process:
[0114] The initial process will be substantially the same for each: i.e. pressurize the chamber to the desired supercritical CO2 pressure and temperature; add appropriate co-solvent and/or surfactant if desired, and soak the substrate or wafer in this high pressure supercritical environment, then conduct one or more of the following combinations of sequences:
CO2 and co- CO2 and Clean CO2 solvent Soak Pulse surfactant flush rinse Megasonics On Megasonics On Megasonics On Megasonics On or Off or Off or Off or Off
[0115] Surfactants are known to help modify the zeta potential (charge) of the particle and/or substrate surface. Other embodiments of the invention process introduce a surfactant with the CO2 after the initial cleaning for the purpose of removing loose particles. For instance, for stripping photoresist one may use a co-solvent such as propylene carbonate to help swell and debond the resist. Pulsing and megasonics will strip the resist but there may remain small particles that need to be removed. In this case a surfactant can be added to the CO2 mixture.
[0116] It should be noted that the apparatus is intended to be readily adapted to an automated production line, such as for robotic loading and unloading off the extended wafer pedestal when the vessel is open. There is also a notable variant of the invention that eliminates one of the forces of concern; gravity. The top platen assembly may incorporate means for holding the wafer upside down and with the capability for rotation in accordance with the figures and description above.
[0117] It is within the scope of the invention, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art from the description and drawings provided, that a wafer edge support system can be configured by the principles described and illustrated to support a wafer between two megasonic transducer arrays for cleaning both sides in a single cleaning cycle.
[0118] These and other embodiments within the scope of the invention and the claims that follow will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the above description and attached figures. For example, there is a process for cleaning semiconductor wafers comprising the steps of soaking a wafer in a supercritical phase cleaning fluid mixture at an elevated pressure, rapidly reducing the elevated pressure to a substantially lower pressure, applying a megasonic acoustical wave action to the cleaning fluid mixture, and flowing a flushing fluid mixture across the wafer while draining the cleaning fluid mixture. The cleaning fluid mixture may remain in supercritical phase at the lower pressure.
[0119] Further, the steps of reducing pressure and applying megasonic action and flowing the flushing fluid mixture may be undertaken at substantially concurrently. The cleaning fluid mixture may comprise carbon dioxide and a co-solvent. The flushing fluid mixture may comprise carbon dioxide and a surfactant.
[0120] As another example, there is an apparatus for cleaning semiconductor wafers comprising a closable cleaning vessel connected to a source of cleaning fluid components and having an exhaust port, where the vessel is capable of sustaining the cleaning fluid at supercritical phase temperature and pressure, and the vessel is configured with a megasonic transducer. The cleaning fluid components may comprise carbon dioxide, and may further comprise supercritical phase carbon dioxide, co-solvent, and surfactant.
[0121] The vessel may comprise an inverted cleaning chamber, a vertically movable underside lid, where the lid is configured with a vertically movable wafer pedestal. The transducer may be at least one ceiling mounted, downward directed transducer and/or be at least one lower platen mounted, upward directed transducer and/or be at least one side mounted, horizontally directed transducer.
[0122] There are numerous other examples of the invention. For example, there is a process for cleaning semiconductor wafers consisting of the steps of soaking a wafer in a supercritical phase cleaning fluid mixture at an elevated pressure, applying a megasonic acoustical wave action to the cleaning fluid mixture, rapidly reducing the elevated pressure to a substantially lower pressure, and flowing a supercritical cleaning fluid across the wafer. The cleaning fluid mixture preferably remains in supercritical phase at the lower pressure. The step of applying megasonic acoustical wave action may be conducted concurrently with the step of soaking, and/or with the steps of rapidly reducing pressure and flushing. The cleaning fluid mixture may be carbon dioxide and a co-solvent. The flushing fluid may be carbon dioxide and a surfactant.
[0123] Also, the wafer may have a preferred side to which the cleaning is directed, and where the process further consists of the initial step of suspending the wafer in a substantially horizontal plane with the preferred side down.
[0124] Further, the process may include the preliminary steps of using a process chamber connected to a source of supercritical phase carbon dioxide, placing a wafer within and closing the process chamber, filling the process chamber with the supercritical phase carbon dioxide, and pressurizing the process chamber to an elevated supercritical pressure. Co-solvents and surfactants are added to the supercritical phase carbon dioxide forming a supercritical phase cleaning fluid mixture, either before or after it is pumped into the process chamber. Then soaking the wafer in the process chamber in the fluid mixture at the elevated pressure. And the steps of pressurizing, adding, soaking, applying, rapidly reducing, and flushing may be repeated as often as needed.
[0125] The elevated pressure may be at least 5000 psi. The substantially lower pressure may be about 1500 psi. The soaking step may have a period of not more than about two minutes. The temperature within the process chamber may be maintained at about 80 degrees Centigrade. The megasonic acoustical wave action being applied to the surface of the wafer may be done with a transducer array having power input in the range of 5-10 watts/cm
[0126] As another example of the invention, there may be an apparatus for cleaning semiconductor wafers consisting of a closable cleaning vessel connected to a source of cleaning fluid, having a fluid outlet, and being capable of sustaining the cleaning fluid at supercritical phase temperature and pressure, where the vessel is configured with at least one megasonic transducer. The cleaning fluid may be supercritical carbon dioxide and may be a mixture of supercritical carbon dioxide and suitable co-solvents, and/or surfactants.
[0127] The vessel may have an inverted cleaning chamber, and a vertically movable underside lid, there the lid is configured with a vertically movable wafer support system. And the wafer support system may be configured for supporting a wafer upside down in the chamber. Or the vessel may have an upright cleaning chamber and an inverted wafer support system. Further, the vessel may have an inverted cleaning chamber, and a vertically movable underside lid, where the lid is configured with a rotable wafer holding mechanism.
[0128] The transducer may be at least one ceiling mounted, downward directed transducer. The transducer may be a multi-segment transducer array. It may be configured for inter-segmentally variability in operational parameters. The transducer may be one or more side mounted, horizontally directed transducers.
[0129] As yet another example, there is an apparatus for cleaning semiconductor wafers consisting of a closable cleaning vessel connected to a source of cleaning fluid and having at least one exhaust port, capable of sustaining the cleaning fluid at supercritical phase temperature and pressure, and configured with at least one megasonic transducer on the lower platen, and having an inverted wafer holder pedestal apparatus mechanized for providing wafer rotation. The transducer may be at least one, and preferably at least two side-mounted, horizontally directed transducers. Or the transducer may be a multi-segment, large area transducer array.
[0130] A further example is an apparatus for cleaning both sides of a semiconductor wafer, having a closable cleaning vessel consisting of a base, a lid, and a wafer holder for holding a wafer in the chamber formed between the base and lid when the vessel is closed. The vessel has at least one exhaust outlet, and is capable of sustaining the cleaning fluid at supercritical phase temperature and pressure. Further, the base and lid are configured with at least one large surface area megasonic transducer and at least one fluid inlet, and an apparatus for rotating the wafer holder.
[0131] Other and various embodiments within the scope of the invention and the appended claims will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the description and figures included.