Plaque It!
Sponsored by: Flash of Genius |
[0001] This invention claims the priority under 35 USC 119(e)(1) of copending U.S. provisional application No. 60/231,652 filed on Sep. 11, 2000.
[0002] The invention relates generally to wireless communications and, more particularly, to channel selection in wireless communications.
[0003] Interference caused by overlapping frequency use is a common problem in wireless communications. For example, several different types of wireless communication systems operate within the 2.4 GHz ISM band. Examples of such systems include IEEE Std 802.11b systems, Bluetooth 1.0 systems and Bluetooth 2.0 systems. Thus, unless properly managed, wireless communications within one system can easily interfere with wireless communications within another system, thereby disadvantageously affecting the quality of communication in both systems.
[0004] Existing interference avoidance techniques are directed to situations wherein multiple users within a single wireless communication system share a common frequency channel. For example, IEEE Std 802.11b includes a clear channel assessment technique wherein a user who wishes to transmit on the common frequency channel first listens on that channel to determine whether another user is currently transmitting on the channel. If so, the listening user continues to listen to the channel until it determines that the other user has stopped transmitting, thereby making the channel available for the listening user. When this occurs, the listening user knows that it can begin transmission without causing interference to or receiving interference from another user. Although the clear channel assessment technique can be effective where multiple users are deliberately assigned to and knowingly share a common frequency channel, the technique would be much less effective if applied in situations wherein communications occurring within different multi-user wireless communication systems interfere with one another.
[0005] It is therefore desirable to provide for avoidance of interference between separate wireless communication systems that can operate in overlapping frequency ranges.
[0006] According to the invention, frequency bands are passively observed for channel quality/interference information, and a frequency band for transmission is selected based on the passive observations. This advantageously permits avoidance of unacceptable interferers from other wireless systems.
[0007]
[0008]
[0009]
[0010]
[0011] According to the invention, a selected wide band channel is passively monitored to obtain information about channel quality and/or interfering signals in that band. This can be done, for example, when a wireless communication station decides that a new channel should be selected for future communications. Such a decision can be made, for example, in response to observed poor channel quality associated with the channel that is currently being used, or in response to user selection of a communication application that requires relatively high quality transmission or a relatively high transmission rate, for example audio, video and multimedia applications. In some embodiments, wide band channels corresponding to possible interferers (for example known 802.11b 16-17 MHz channels) are passively monitored to determine whether or not the quality/interference levels in those bands are acceptable. In some embodiments, the transmission bandwidth (for example a 4-5 MHz Bluetooth 2.0 channel) in which transmission is desired can be passively monitored to determine channel quality/interference levels. In other embodiments, any desired combination of wide band channels of known interferers and desired transmission bandwidths can be passively monitored. In some embodiments, the passive monitoring is accomplished by making conventional RSSI (received signal strength indication) measurements at one or both ends of an existing wireless communication link. Different channel bandwidths can be used for the RSSI measurements, e.g. the 16-17 MHz of 802.11b and a 10 MHz channel width to avoid microwave oven interference.
[0012] When passive monitoring is performed at both ends of a communication link, the results obtained by one end can be reported to the other end using any desired type of conventional wireless communication technique. For example, if the wireless communication link exists between two Bluetooth 1.0 devices, then the slave device can report its observations to the master device using a predetermined Bluetooth hopping sequence. Conversely, the master could report its observations to the slave in the same fashion. In some embodiments, each frequency in a wide band channel is assigned an index, and the communicating devices can report their observations to one another by reporting the indices associated with either the unacceptably interfered frequencies or the acceptably clear frequencies. For example, if a 16 MHz wide band channel associated with a possible interferer is found to be acceptably clear, and if transmission in a 4 MHz band is desired, then indices of 12 possible 4 MHz bands are reported. In some embodiments, these indices are repeatedly transmitted to the other end of the link for a predetermined number of transmissions. Any predetermined numbering scheme can be used to designate the various bands, and the numbers corresponding to either clear or interfered bands can be transmitted from one end to the other.
[0013] The following example illustrates an advantage of passively monitoring interference levels at both ends of a communication link. If a pair of communicating Bluetooth devices at opposite ends of a Bluetooth communication link passively monitor the wide band channels associated with an IEEE 802.11b system, it is possible to detect whether either of the Bluetooth devices is interfered with by an 802.11b device. This is advantageous because, due to geographical circumstances, it is possible for one end of a Bluetooth link to be interfered with by an 802.11b device while the other end of the Bluetooth link is substantially free of 802.11b interference.
[0014] In some embodiments, the passive monitoring can be applied to narrow band channels, such as the 1 MHz channels of Bluetooth 1.0 systems, and then several of these narrow band channel observations can be combined to obtain a resultant observation on a wider band channel, for example a 5 MHz channel of a Bluetooth 2.0 system.
[0015] After using passive monitoring techniques such as described above, an active probing technique can be used with respect to each available frequency of any wide band channels that the passive monitoring has identified as acceptable. An example of such an active probing technique is the probe, listen and select (PLS) technique described in copending U.S. Ser. No. 09/777,201 (docket no. TI-31285), filed on Feb. 5, 2001, incorporated herein by reference. In other embodiments, any desired frequency channel within an acceptable wide band channel can be chosen arbitrarily, without passively or actively monitoring that specific frequency individually.
[0016]
[0017] The broken line
[0018] The broken lines
[0019] Returning to decision
[0020] In some embodiments, the question at 11 can be answered “yes” periodically, even if no new channel is needed. In this way, known good channels will be immediately available when, for example, it is later determined at 11 that a new channel is actually needed.
[0021]
[0022] A user input signal
[0023]
[0024] After the RSSI measurements have been collected for all wide band channels selected by the band selector
[0025] In some embodiments, the band selector
[0026] In some embodiments, the band selection controller
[0027] The band selector
[0028] It will be evident to workers in the art that the exemplary embodiments of FIGS.
[0029] Although exemplary embodiments of the invention are described above in detail, this does not limit the scope of the invention, which can be practiced in a variety of embodiments.