Plaque It!
Sponsored by: Flash of Genius |
[0001] This is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application Ser. No. 09/551,291 titled “A Distributed Network Communication System which Enables Multiple Network Providers to Use a Common Distributed Network Infrastructure” and filed on Apr. 18, 2000, whose inventors are Brett B. Stewart, James W. Thompson and Kathleen E. McClelland.
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] This invention relates generally to wireless network communications, and more specifically to a system and method enabling a network infrastructure to support multiple wireless service providers and/or customers of multiple wireless service providers. The invention also relates to a system and method enabling different access levels within a wired or wireless network system.
[0004] 2. Description of the Relevant Art
[0005] Various types of wired and wireless infrastructures are being developed to service users of computing devices, such as portable computing devices (PCDs). Currently, numerous wireless service providers are attempting to install wireless network infrastructures in various locations, such as airports, hotels, office buildings, shopping malls, etc. for use by various users, such as mobile users (MUs) of PCDs.
[0006] However, when two or more providers install a wireless network infrastructure in a single location, such as an airport, the providers begin to oversubscribe the RF domain. In other words, the electromagnetic spectrum usable by these wireless networks is limited, and if two or more wireless networks are installed in the same location, this may result in inadequate RF bandwidth for use by each of these networks.
[0007] IEEE 802.11 defines the IEEE standard for wireless Ethernet. IEEE 802.11 is designed to support multiple overlapping wireless local area networks (LANs) in a given coverage area. Each wireless local area network will typically include one or more access points (APs) which communicate in a wireless fashion with a corresponding computing device of a user, which typically includes a wireless Ethernet transceiver. IEEE 802.11 currently uses a System ID (SID) to “select” which LAN to use and the access point with which to associate.
[0008] Currently, only 3 non-overlapping RF channels are available for different wireless service providers. Once these channels are used, no further bandwidth, or limited bandwidth, may be available for other providers.
[0009] In the U.S. and most of Europe, only 3 non-overlapping channels are available using 802.11 Direct Spread (802.11 DS) (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum) radios. In other geographies, such as France and Japan, only one channel is available using 802.11 DS. When using Frequency Hopping radios, only one “channel” is defined. The use of different “spreading codes” in conjunction with FH radios only obfuscates the co-interference. Once the available channels are used, perhaps one by each provider of a wireless infrastructure, no further bandwidth is available for other providers without the potential for harmful co-interference and the resultant reduction in available bandwidth.
[0010] Thus, due to the problems associated with multiple wireless infrastructures installed in a common area, it is desirable to provide a single wireless infrastructure which may be used by two or more wireless service providers (WSPs). This would allow a plurality of WSPs to utilize a common set of access points (APs) to provide service to a potentially overlapping set of customers or subscribers. It may also be desirable to provide a wireless infrastructure which can selectively provide different access levels to users of the system.
[0011] In the installation of a common-use wireless system, there are commonly two approaches to providing service to each WSP's subscribers, wherein each approach uses a common authentication/accounting system. A common authentication/accounting system involves “tying together” the authentication/accounting systems of each provider, thereby forming a “roaming consortium”. The first approach is called RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service), and the second approach is called TACACS+. Typically these consortiums use the RADIUS as a common authentication and accounting protocol. RADIUS is a protocol defined by the IETF RADIUS Working Group for carrying information between network access devices and security/accounting servers, and is documented in RFCs 2138 and 2139. TACACS+, a similar protocol developed by Cisco Systems, is also used by some providers, although it suffers from security issues in common implementations.
[0012] The main advantage of tying the authentication/accounting systems together is the relative ease of doing so. Indeed, RADIUS was designed to support a tiered hierarchy of services providers. However, this seeming ease of implementation hides other issues which remain unsolved via this approach. Most of these center around the fact that RADIUS and TACACS+ were designed to support connectivity via a dial-up network (using either modems or ISDN). Indeed, the very acronym “RADIUS” references this dial-up heritage and focus. Since Wireless LANs are not “dial-up” by their very nature, several assumptions which are “built-in” to the RADIUS and TACACS+ protocols have the potential to limit the type and number of services deployed over wireless LANs.
[0013] RADIUS has its share of security issues as well. The RADIUS protocol is open to a possible dictionary attack on “shared secret” passwords. Discovery of these can be used to spoof “Access-Accept” packets, with the result of “free service” being granted to the attacker. While this security hole is only possible if the attacker is able to “sniff” communications between the RADIUS server and client, wireless networks make this type of unauthorized access even more likely.
[0014] However, the most glaring issue associated with using a common authentication/accounting system is that any approach that ties the authentication and accounting systems of a set of WSPs together does nothing to solve problems related to “ESSIDs”, described below.
[0015] As noted above, the IEEE 802.11 specification is a wireless LAN standard developed by the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering) committee in order to specify an “over the air” interface between a wireless client and a base station or Access Point, as well as among wireless clients. First conceived in 1990, the standard has evolved from various Draft versions (Drafts 1 through 6), with approval of the final draft on Jun. 26, 1997.
[0016] The 802.11 MAC layer, supported by an underlying PHY layer, is concerned primarily with rules for accessing the wireless medium. Two network architectures are defined: the Infrastructure Network and the Ad Hoc Network. The Infrastructure Network is a network architecture for providing communication between wireless clients and wired network resources. The transmission of data from the wireless to the wired medium is via an Access Point (AP). The coverage area is defined by an AP and its associated wireless clients, and together all the devices form a Basic Service Set (BSS).
[0017] The IEEE 802.11 protocol also defines an ESSID (Extended Service Set ID) that is essentially a network name. The ESSID is used to select an associated wireless LAN infrastructure. Two or more BSSs configured with the same ESSID attached to a common distribution system (for instance, an Ethernet LAN) form an ESS (Extended Service Set.)
[0018] With multiple access points, clients (PCDs) are free to move seamlessly between access points, as long as the ESSID matches. This feature is built into the 802.11 specification. When a client (PCD) starts losing the signal with its associated access point, it begins to search the area for a closer access point. Once a new access point is found, the client initiates an association with the new access point and a disassociation from the old one.
[0019] In public-access networks the ESSID has been commonly used to choose the WSP infrastructure with which to associate. However, this creates a problem: Each AP can only support one ESS and one associated ESSID. Thus, in order for multiple service providers to share a common space, N sets of APs are needed, where N is the number of service providers. This leads to co-interference, over-subscription of the RF environment and resultant lack of available bandwidth, as described above.
[0020] The commonly suggested solution to this problem is that all WSPs who wish to allow roaming agree on a common ESSID for their wireless networks. While initially this may appear to solve the problem, it also requires not only a common authentication system, but also a common network infrastructure which connects to the Internet and other services. The issues with a common authentication system have been outlined above. There are also numerous issues associated with using a common ESSID to support multiple WSPs in a common network infrastructure.
[0021] First, a common network infrastructure with a shared ESSID would result in insufficient network security. Since all devices would necessarily be associated with the same network infrastructure, all manner of attacks, both active (such as Denial of Service) and passive (e.g. snooping or sniffing) would be possible.
[0022] Second, to rely on coordination of ESSIDs among a potentially large number of WSPs seems questionable at best. As new providers enter the market, each must choose to configure its APs such that roaming by other providers' subscribers is permitted. In fact, the case can be made that every WSP who chooses to participate in any roaming network would need to configure ALL of its APs to support this as yet undefined ESSID.
[0023] Even if these steps are taken, once every WSP has chosen to use the same ESSID, a new problem occurs. Unless roaming agreements are global, and every provider agrees to allow each other provider to roam on its APs, the user of any given service cannot know that his/her WSP(s) provide service in any given area. The user of such a service is left to “guess” at service availability.
[0024] Further, global coordination around a single ESSID (combined with a common authentication system) does not solve the problem. An increasing number of enterprises (large and small) are installing 802.11-compliant network infrastructures, and equipping the employees of these companies with wireless Network Interface Cards (NICs). Each of these enterprises will likely define its own ESSID, and possibly an associated WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) key. Further still, inexpensive 802.11-compliant APs are now available for the home market (witness the Apple Airport), and these wireless networks will likely have their own ESSIDs.
[0025] Thus, even if all WSPs select and co-ordinate on a single ESSID, enterprises (including airlines) and other users of 802.11-compliant NICs will need to reconfigure their equipment in order to use any common-ESSID network provided by these WSPs. This would likely be too inconvenient for most users.
[0026] Finally, given a common infrastructure, only one broadcast domain is possible. For an IP-based network (such as must be supplied to provide connectivity to the Internet), this implies that only one IP address space (and by extension, one Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) server) is possible for each location. This implies that the WSP who owns the infrastructure (and supplies the connectivity) in each location has an advantage in that the network connectivity for that WSP's customers will experience better connectivity. Also implied is that any resource located on the network (such as file or video servers, voice gateways, and otherwise secured facilities of other airport tenants) is available to all users of the wireless infrastructure, and thus no service differentiation is possible.
[0027] Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a system and method which enables a common wireless network infrastructure (and especially an IEEE 802.11 wireless network infrastructure) to be used by two or more wireless service providers (WSPs). This would allow a plurality of service providers to utilize a common set of access points to provide service to a potentially overlapping set of customers. This would also provide subscribers or users with the ability to more fully utilize the existing network infrastructure. It would further be desirable to provide a distributed wireless network system which can selectively provide different access levels to users of the system.
[0028] One embodiment of the present invention comprises a system and method for enabling multiple wireless service providers (WSPs) to use or provide services on a common wireless network infrastructure. The system and method can thus provide access and/or roaming features on a distributed wireless network system.
[0029] The network system includes a plurality of access points (APs) coupled to a network. The network access points include wireless access points, and may also include wired access points. Access points for the network may be widely distributed in various facilities, such as airports, mass-transit stations, hotels, and various businesses, such as business offices, restaurants, and stores. The network may couple to a wide area network, such as the Internet. A plurality of wireless service providers (WSPs) or network providers may provide network services, such as Internet access, over the network infrastructure.
[0030] In one embodiment, a user, also referred to as a subscriber, may access the network system through a portable computing device (PCD) using, for example, a wireless network interface card (NIC). When in sufficiently close range to an access point, the PCD may wirelessly communicate with the AP in the network system. In one embodiment, the APs are arranged at known geographic locations and may provide geographic location information regarding the geographic location of the AP or the mobile user.
[0031] Each PCD may store identification information which may uniquely indicate at least one wireless service provider of a plurality of possible wireless service providers. The identification information thus may designate the wireless service provider (or providers) to which the user of the PCD is a subscriber. The identification information may take various forms, such as a System ID (SID), MAC ID, or other identification which may be used to identify the wireless service provider to which the user has subscribed. As used herein, the SID may comprise an SSID (Service Set ID) or an ESSID (Extended Service Set ID). When the PCD becomes close to an access point, the PCD may provide the identification information to the access point.
[0032] In one embodiment, each of the access points is operable to “listen for” or detect identification information, e.g., System IDs, associated with numerous different providers, contained in “probes” broadcast by PCDs. Alternatively, each of the access points may be operable to broadcast requests for identification information, e.g., broadcast recognized System IDs to the PCDs, wherein the PCDs may respond to this broadcast by providing the identification information. Such broadcasts by APs are known as “beacons”.
[0033] When an access point receives the identification information from a PCD of a user, the access point may determine the appropriate wireless service provider for the portable computing device using the identification information. Thus, the network system is able to recognize and process identification information which identifies any of the plurality of possible wireless service providers. In one embodiment, the APs answer all queries from all PCDs, even if the identification information from the PCD does not match the information available to that particular AP, e.g., even if an unknown SID is received.
[0034] In one embodiment, the network system may include a memory medium which stores a list of identification information that maps to a corresponding list of the plurality of possible wireless service providers. The memory medium may be comprised in one or more of, or all of, the access points, or may be comprised in one or more other devices connected to the network, such as a computer system. In this embodiment, determining the wireless service provider for the portable computing device includes accessing the memory medium and using the received identification information to determine the wireless service provider. For example, the access point or other device may use the received System ID to index into a table to determine the appropriate WSP.
[0035] The memory medium may also store associated access information. For each of the wireless service providers, the access information may include access methods for providing user data to the respective wireless service provider, such as a destination IP address of the WSP. The appropriate access method may be used based on the identification information and/or the determined WSP. Thus, the identification information may be used to determine the appropriate WSP as well as to automatically route network packets or data between that PCD and the appropriate provider.
[0036] The access information stored in the memory medium may also include an access level which indicates the user's access rights or privilege level. Thus, the local network or the WSP may provide various local resources which are available to all users regardless of access level, and users with a higher access level may additionally be entitled to Internet access. In other environments, all users may receive Internet access, and users with a lower access level may not be entitled to view or utilize certain or all local network resources on the network. Thus, depending on the access level, the user may be provided solely with external Internet access, or only local network access, or may be provided with no network services. The access level may also possibly depend on the known geographic location of the AP or the user. For example, the access level for each user may vary depending on the known geographic location of the AP to which the user is currently associated, or may depend on the approximate geographic location of the user, e.g., may depend on whether the user is in a certain store or in a secure area.
[0037] In one embodiment, one or more of the wireless service provider ID and the access information may be provided by the PCD of the user. Thus, an access point or other device on the network may not be required to perform a look-up to determine this information, but rather this information may be provided by the PCD.
[0038] When the portable computing device communicates with the access point, network access may be provided to the portable computing device through the determined WSP. For example, the access point may provide the communicated data to a destination based on or specified by the determined WSP, e.g., may provide or route the data to the determined wireless service provider's site, e.g., to equipment provided by the WSP. The WSP may then provide Internet access and/or other network services. The WSP will also typically charge a fee for this service. The access point preferably provides the data to the destination in a secure manner to prevent the data from being unintentionally provided to third parties, such as other providers.
[0039] Thus the wireless network system is useable by subscribers of each of the plurality of possible wireless service providers, thereby enabling subscribers to “roam” on various networks, including networks maintained by other providers. For example, the plurality of access points may be maintained by a first WSP, and a subscriber of a second WSP may be recognized and allowed use of the network. Alternatively, the plurality of access points may be maintained by an independent third party, and subscribers of any of various WSPs may be recognized and allowed use of the network. Wireless service providers may charge subscribers for access regardless of who operates or maintains the network. In addition, the network system may selectively provide users different access levels to network resources depending on the access or privilege level of the user. This allows WSPs to offer different levels of access to customers, possibly based on different service fee levels. This also allows visitors or non-members of a network system to be allowed certain network services, such as Internet access, without compromising other private network resources.
[0040] In one embodiment, the system includes at least one AP with software which is executable to provide access point functionality for each of a plurality of WSPs. The software may implement a “super access point” which maintains associations between the plurality of WSPs and a corresponding plurality of SIDs, such as MAC IDs, ESSIDs, etc. The AP may be capable of broadcasting or recognizing any of the plurality of SIDS, behaving appropriately for different SIDS that are received from PCDs of users, and providing network services to each user through that user's corresponding WSP. Thus an AP may be operable to appear as any one of a plurality of different WSP APs, meaning that a single AP may “pretend to be” or behave as an access point dedicated to a particular WSP for each of a plurality of different WSPs.
[0041] In one embodiment, the system provides a plurality of virtual APs, where a virtual AP may comprise access point functionality implemented in software that appears as a physical AP to a PCD. The plurality of virtual APs or “software” APs may be implemented on one or more physical APs, e.g., on a common set of physical APs. For example, each physical AP may implement a plurality of virtual APs. Each instance of a virtual AP executes a complete 802.11 protocol stack, and may be indistinguishable from a hardware AP to any wireless network client(s). Each virtual AP or “software” AP may include its own ESSID and may be uniquely associated with a corresponding WSP. Thus, each WSP that uses a virtual AP solution would enjoy the illusion that there was a complete wireless infrastructure available for its exclusive use. In one embodiment, the System ID of each virtual AP may be a variant of the SID of the physical AP hosting the virtual APs.
[0042] Each of the APs may connect to a “wired” LAN. In one embodiment, the “wired” LAN supports a VLAN (Virtual LAN) protocol. In order to partition the network, the network system may maintain a binding between the ESSID and IEEE 802.1(q) VLAN tags or their equivalent. This allows a common wired backbone (using VLAN-capable Ethernet switches) to supply a secured “virtual LAN” to each WSP. In order to provide service differentiation and quality of service (QoS) to each user of the network, the network system may further enable 802.1(p) in these tags. This allows the proprietor of the network system to provide service level agreements to its customers, including both other WSPs and, for example, airport tenants. The network architecture described herein can scale to support hundreds of these network customers, and thousands of simultaneous users in each location.
[0043] In order to support users who arrive at the wireless network location (e.g., an airport) with an ESSID that does not match the ESSID of any WSP, the network system also allows for a “default” mapping. Users who arrive with a different ESSID, e.g., the ESSID used at their home or enterprise, would have their network data passed to a default or selected provider. This provider may present the user with the opportunity to use the network on a one-time basis, or may present the user with the opportunity to register with the provider, perhaps by requesting credit card information from the user.
[0044] The wireless network system described herein enjoys several advantages over the approach of tying the authentication system of each subscriber to a roaming “clearing house”. The wireless network system described herein leverages the 802.11 protocol, and is agnostic as to which PHY technology is used. The present system can support all of the following 802.11 technologies:
[0045] 802.11 FH (Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum@1-2 Mbps in 2.4 Ghz)
[0046] 802.11 DS (Direct Sequencing Spread Spectrum @1-2 Mbps in 2.4 Ghz)
[0047] 802.11(b) (High-rate (11 Mbps) DSSS in 2.4 Ghz)
[0048] 802.11(a) (High-rate (50 Mbps) FHSS in 5.7 Ghz)
[0049] Bluetooth (FHSS@<1 Mbps in 2.4 Ghz) (via similar virtualization of the SDP)
[0050] In one embodiment, the physical AP may comprise two radios, one Direct Spread Coding radio, and one Frequency Hopping radio, thus providing multiple PHY layers on one physical AP. Using the present system, one set of APs (for a given PHY technology) can maximize the coverage in a given space with a minimum of co-interference. A group of providers can share this “footprint”, enabling maximum coverage for the superset of the subscribers to each service. Each wireless service provider can leverage their expertise in attracting members and providing value-added services or content.
[0051] In addition, each location authority, (e.g., an airport authority) can deal with one “master concession”, who is responsible for building and maintaining the RF infrastructure, manages the RF environment, and sub-leases this infrastructure to the other providers. In fact, the location authority can act as the “master concession”, should it so desire.
[0052] The present system is also transparent to authentication technology used by any provider. Due to the issues raised above, the wireless subscriber technology described herein is not based on RADIUS or TACACS+. Instead, the present subscriber technology may use a “single sign-on” technology based on X.509 certificates. Similar technology is used to secure nearly every WWW transaction that requires protection.
[0053] The present system is also transparent to the network protocols in-use. While other provider's approaches assume that IPv4 is the only protocol in-use, the present system allows other protocols (IPX, IPv6, NetBIOS, ARP, etc) to be used in the network as they normally would, with the singular exception that these flows take place within the virtual LAN provided by the APs and the network backbone.
[0054] Thus the wireless network system described herein enables a common infrastructure to be used by a plurality of wireless service providers, and provides a number of advantages over the prior art.
[0055] Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065] While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
[0066] Incorporation by Reference
[0067] U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/551,291 titled “A Distributed Network Communication System which Enables Multiple Network Providers to Use a Common Distributed Network Infrastructure” and filed on Apr. 18, 2000, whose inventors are Brett B. Stewart, James W. Thompson and Kathleen E. McClelland is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
[0068] U.S. Pat. No. 5,835,061 titled “Method and Apparatus for Geographic-Based Communications Service”, whose inventor is Brett B. Stewart, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
[0069] U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,678 titled “System for Hybrid Wired and Wireless Geographic-Based Communications Service”, whose inventor is Brett B. Stewart, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
[0070] U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/433,817 titled “Geographic Based Communications Service” and filed on Nov. 3, 1999, whose inventors are Brett B. Stewart and James Thompson, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
[0071] U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/433,818 titled “A Network Communications Service with an Improved Subscriber Model Using Digital Certificates” and filed on Nov. 3, 1999, whose inventors are Brett B. Stewart and James Thompson, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
[0072] U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/551,309 titled “System and Method for Managing User Demographic Information Using Digital Certificates” and filed on Apr. 18, 2000, whose inventors are Brett B. Stewart and James Thompson, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
[0073]
[0074]
[0075] Each AP
[0076] The network
[0077] The access points (APs)
[0078] Each access point
[0079] A user operating a portable computing device (PCD)
[0080] The portable computing device
[0081] The PCD
[0082] Where the access point
[0083] Where the access point
[0084] One or more wireless service providers may each have an associated network device
[0085] A user operating a portable computing device
[0086] The network system
[0087] As discussed further below, when a portable communication device
[0088] The MIB
[0089] One or more service providers
[0090] The network communication system
[0091] In one embodiment, the network communication system
[0092] Memory Medium and Carrier Medium
[0093] One or more of the systems described above, such as PCD
[0094] One or more of the access points
[0095] In one embodiment, at least one of the APs
[0096] In another embodiment, at least one of the APs
[0097] In the virtual AP embodiment described above, as noted, for one or more of the access points
[0098] However, when multiple virtual APs are comprised on or implemented on a single physical AP, it may not be possible to use the same MAC ID of the physical AP as the BSSID of each of the virtual APs on that physical AP. In other words, using this approach, each of the virtual APs may not receive a unique BSSID, as they each would have the MAC ID of the physical AP. If it is desired or required for each of the virtual APs to have a unique BSSID, then various alternative methods may be used. In one embodiment of the invention, the MAC ID of the single physical AP is simply used for all virtual APs, i.e., is used as the BSSID for all virtual APs on that physical AP. Thus, in this embodiment, each of the virtual APs on a single physical AP has the same BSSID. It is currently not believed that this will impact the operation of each of the virtual APs in any way. In an alternate embodiment, where it is desired that each of the virtual APs has a different respective BSSID, then the “local to network” MAC ID address bits which are defined by IEEE are adjusted for each of the respective virtual APs to produce a unique MAC ID for each of the virtual APs.
[0099] In yet another alternate embodiment, the physical AP is initially assigned a pool of MAC ID addresses and each of the virtual APs is assigned a unique MAC ID from this pool, thus providing each virtual AP with a unique MAC ID address, i.e., a unique BSSID. One drawback to this implementation is the need for a larger number of MAC ID addresses than the methods previously described.
[0100] In one embodiment, a single physical AP may support both Infrastructure Network mode (BSS) and Ad Hoc Network mode (Independent BSS, or IBSS). In Ad Hoc mode, each AP is just another peer on the network. This may be accomplished by configuring one or more virtual APs for BSS, as described above, and one or more other virtual APs (also on the same physical AP) for IBSS, or Ad Hoc Network mode.
[0101] The term “memory medium” is intended to include various types of memory or storage, including an installation medium, e.g., a CD-ROM, or floppy disks
[0102] Also, each of the systems described above may take various forms, including a personal computer system, mainframe computer system, workstation, network appliance, Internet appliance, personal digital assistant (PDA), television system or other device. In general, the term “computer system” can be broadly defined to encompass any device having a processor which executes instructions from a memory medium.
[0103] The memory medium in one or more of the above systems thus may store a software program or data for performing or enabling roaming or selective network resource access within a network system
[0104] Various embodiments further include receiving or storing instructions and/or data implemented in accordance with the present description upon a carrier medium. Suitable carrier media include memory media as described above, as well as signals such as electrical, electromagnetic, or other forms of analog or digital signals, conveyed via a communication medium such as networks and/or a wireless link.
[0105]
[0106]
[0107] In this embodiment, the data structure may store an identification information/VLAN tag mapping, e.g., an SD I VLAN tag mapping, which operates to map the user to the appropriate VLAN of the user's wireless service provider. Thus, on the wired network to which the access points
[0108] As shown, each of VLAN1, VLAN2 and VLAN3 may be supported by one or more Ethernet switches which support tagged VLANs IEEE 802.1q). In addition, each switch may also support IEEE 802.1p, which provides for various quality of service (QoS) metrics. This enables the switches to enforce certain predefined quality of service metrics for any given port or virtual port contained within the network. As shown in
[0109] Using VLANs, each access point
[0110]
[0111]
[0112] The network access method of the present invention may be operable to receive and use the identification information to facilitate roaming, e.g., to allow a particular wireless service of a plurality of possible wireless services to be selected and used for a user operating on the network. As discussed further below, the identification information may also store access level information which may be used to indicate a network access or privilege level. This stored access level information may be used to selectively allow user access to different parts of the network.
[0113] As shown, in step
[0114] In step
[0115] In prior art systems, access points are only able to “listen for” one System ID which corresponds to one wireless service provider. According to one embodiment of the invention, each access point
[0116] In step
[0117] The geographic location information may also be used in determining the network services or access privileges of the user, or used in determining charging aspects of the use. For example, this known geographic location information may be used to determine whether a third party pays for the network access of the user. As one example, an employer of the user (employee) may have previously directed that the employer will pay for network access of the employee if the employee is located in an airport or hotel, but not if the employee is located, for example, in a bar. The known geographic location may also be used to determine a charge rate, based on various incentive or sponsorship programs of which the user is a member. For example, the user may receive a discount if he/she uses network access from certain locations, such as a certain business, a certain airport club, etc. The known geographic location information may also be used to selectively provide different access or privilege levels based on the geographic location, e.g., a user may have greater privilege/access levels at a first geographic location than from a second different geographic location. This known geographic location information may further be used to provide services to the user which are dependent upon the geographic location of the user. For more information on the use of geographic location information for providing geographic based services, please see U.S. Pat. No. 5,835,061, referenced above.
[0118] In step
[0119] In step
[0120] Also, if the identification information is determined to not be known, the access or privilege level of the user may be set to the lowest possible level. This, for example, may allow the user to only have access to certain limited local resources, but no external access, e.g., to the Internet. Thus, for example, where the APs
[0121] If known identification information is determined to be received in step
[0122] In an alternate embodiment, the PCD
[0123] As discussed above, the data structure is preferably a table comprising a plurality of three-tuples wherein each tuple stores a set of identification information, the corresponding wireless service provider associated with that identification information, and access information associated with that wireless service provider and/or the user. An example of this data structure is shown in
[0124] The access information may include an access method, possibly including a destination address, or other method by which data packets are routed to/from the respective site of the wireless service provider, or other method which directs that network access be provided by that wireless service provider. The access information may also include a SID/wired transport mechanism mapping, such as a SID/VLAN tag mapping. The access information may also include an access level or privilege level that indicates which network resources that the user may access, e.g., whether the user is only allowed access to resources on the local network
[0125] Thus, when the access point